Free preview
This is the free notes preview
You're reading the free notes. In My Learning the same topic also comes with:
- FlashcardsLock in vocabulary and key terms with spaced repetition.
- Practice questionsAnswer exam-style questions and get instant AI marking.
- Mock exams & past-paper vaultSit full mocks and see exactly how examiners award marks.
- Personalised study planA daily plan built around your exam date and weak areas.
Why open opposition was rare: In most authoritarian states, few people dared to speak out. That was not because everyone agreed with the regime, but because standing against it could cost you your freedom or your life.
Imagine living under a dictator who has already taken full control. If you disagreed, you faced a hard choice: keep quiet, run away, or risk prison, a labour camp, or death.
Most people quietly chose silence, and that silence is exactly what the regime wanted.
Historians sort the resistance that did happen into two kinds. Active opposition meant actually doing something, like printing secret leaflets, plotting, or sabotage.
Passive opposition was quieter, like grumbling at home or refusing to join in with rallies and salutes.
Opposition could come from all sorts of groups, such as rival politicians, church leaders, young people, ethnic minorities, or even the army. But because the regime watched everyone so closely and punished so harshly, open resistance usually stayed small, secret, and easy to crush.
The three questions to always ask: When you study opposition in any state, answer three things. Who opposed the regime? How much opposition was there, which is usually not much? And how did the regime deal with it?
Memory hook: SCRAP opposition: The main tools a regime used to deal with opponents spell SCRAP: Surveillance, Camps, Repression and terror, Arrests and executions, Purges and show trials.
SCRAP is how the state scrapped its opponents.
Let's take those three questions one at a time. First, who actually resisted, and why did so few people manage it?
The nature of opposition — who resisted?: Opponents came from many corners of society: political rivals, churches, youth groups, ethnic minorities, writers and thinkers, and sometimes the army. Most of what they did was passive resistance, because open plots were far too dangerous.
The extent — usually limited: Open opposition was normally small and weak. Fear, propaganda, a divided and disorganised opposition, and some genuine popular support all worked together to keep resistance down.
Now for the third question, and the one exams focus on most: how did the regime actually treat the people who resisted? The answer, almost everywhere, was repression and terror.
Below are the main methods regimes used. Notice the double purpose behind them: they were meant to destroy the actual opponents, and to frighten everyone else into staying quiet.
Concentration camps and the Gulag
Regimes locked opponents away, often to be worked to death. The Nazis opened camps like Dachau in 1933 for political prisoners, and the Soviet Gulag held millions.
Show trials
A show trial put opponents in court where the outcome was already decided. The staged confessions were used as propaganda to 'prove' guilt and justify killing.
Purges of rivals
A purge cleaned out anyone seen as a threat, even loyal party members. This kept insiders too frightened to challenge the leader.
Secret police and informers
Surveillance caught opposition early. The Gestapo in Germany and the NKVD in the USSR relied on ordinary citizens informing on their own neighbours.
Mass terror
Beyond targeting real opponents, regimes used unpredictable arrests and violence to frighten the whole population. Stalin's Great Terror of 1936 to 1938 is the clearest example.
Camps, courts, purges, spies, and terror — five ways the state crushed dissent.
Stalin's USSR (Europe) — terror at scale
- The Great Terror, also called the Great Purges, ran from 1936 to 1938 and swept up millions.
- The Moscow show trials put old party leaders like Zinoviev, Kamenev and Bukharin in the dock and executed them.
- The army was purged too, with most senior officers shot.
- Gulag camps filled with prisoners, and the NKVD secret police watched the population.
Hitler's Germany (Europe) — targeted then total
- The Night of the Long Knives on 30 June 1934 murdered SA leaders and other rivals.
- Concentration camps opened from 1933, first for political prisoners and later for minorities.
- The Gestapo and a web of informers watched everyone for signs of dissent.
- Church and youth resistance, like the White Rose student group, was crushed.
A different region: Mao's China (Asia): Mao crushed opposition through huge public campaigns. The Anti-Rightist Campaign of 1957 silenced critics who had spoken up during the earlier Hundred Flowers period, and the Cultural Revolution of 1966 to 1976 sent Red Guards to attack anyone branded an 'enemy'. This gives you a strong Asian example to pair with a European one.
See how examiners mark answers
Access past paper questions with model answers. Learn exactly what earns marks and what doesn't.
How this is tested (Paper 2): Paper 2 is a comparative essay with no sources. You must use two authoritarian states from different regions, such as Stalin's USSR in Europe and Mao's China in Asia. The marks come from judgement and comparison, not from retelling the story.
Evaluate the methods used to deal with opposition in two authoritarian states, each chosen from a different region.
Model answer plan
See the mark-by-mark plan — for / against / judgement, with marking guidance — in study mode.
Common mistakes: Do not pick two states from the same region, since Hitler and Stalin are both Europe and would not be allowed.
Do not tell the story of each regime separately with no real comparison.
Do not mix up dates or attach the wrong event to the wrong state, for example the Gulag is Soviet, not Nazi.