Free preview
This is the free notes preview
You're reading the free notes. In My Learning the same topic also comes with:
- FlashcardsLock in vocabulary and key terms with spaced repetition.
- Practice questionsAnswer exam-style questions and get instant AI marking.
- Mock exams & past-paper vaultSit full mocks and see exactly how examiners award marks.
- Personalised study planA daily plan built around your exam date and weak areas.
Aims are not the same as results: Authoritarian leaders all made bold promises. What really matters for the exam is whether they actually delivered, and how many lives it cost to get there.
Every authoritarian regime needed two things at home. It needed an economy that served the state, and a political system with no rivals left to challenge it.
So each leader used two kinds of policy. Economic policies meant state-run industry, weapons factories and control of farming.
Political policies meant one-party rule, power pulled to the top, and the removal of anyone who got in the way.
Here is the move that earns marks in Paper 2. Always separate what a regime wanted to happen from what actually happened.
The two are rarely the same.
Many of these policies did hit some of their targets. But they also caused famine, shortages and mass death, so the honest verdict is usually mixed rather than a clean win or a clean failure.
A quick example of the gap: Stalin wanted the state to control all the grain, and it did. But the same policy starved millions of people in Ukraine. The aim was met; the result was a disaster. That gap is exactly what you are asked to judge.
The hard words, in plain English
Autarky
Making the USSR self-sufficient so it need not depend on capitalist countries for goods.
Collectivisation
Merging small peasant farms into large state-run collective farms from 1929.
Five-Year Plan
A central plan setting huge production targets for industry, first launched in 1928.
Rearmament
Building up weapons and heavy industry to prepare the USSR for a future war.
One-party state
A system where only the Communist Party is allowed and all rivals are banned.
Centralisation
Concentrating all economic and political decisions in the hands of the central state.
Every regime chased self-sufficiency, growth and control, and paid for it in human lives.
Memory hook: AIM vs REAL: For every policy, ask two questions: what was the AIM, and what was the REAL result, counting both the wins and the human cost. For the economic aims, remember A.R.M.S — Autarky, Rearmament, Modernisation, State control.
Now let's watch these policies at work in three regimes. Two sit in Europe, Nazi Germany and Stalin's USSR, and one sits in Asia, Mao's China.
Keep one thing in mind as you read. The aims look surprisingly similar across all three, yet the results ended up very different.
Four policy goals and what really happened
Aim 1 — Self-sufficiency and rearmament
Free the USSR from relying on foreign imports and build the heavy industry needed for weapons.
Aim 2 — Rapid industrialisation
Turn a backward farming country into a modern industrial power in just a few years through the Five-Year Plans.
Aim 3 — State control of farming
Replace private peasant farms with collective farms the state could control and tax for grain.
Aim 4 — Total political control
Crush all opposition so that the Party, and Stalin, held complete power.
Self-sufficiency, growth, food control, total power — each aim was partly met and heavily paid for.
Notice the pattern: The purge and the show of force were how these leaders secured power. Control was almost always achieved, but the cost in freedom and lives was huge.
Stated AIMS
- Become self-sufficient (autarky) and rearm for war
- Modernise and industrialise as fast as possible
- Take state control of the economy and the food supply
- Secure total one-party political control
Actual RESULTS
- Only partial — Germany still had to import key materials
- Real industrial growth in the USSR, but poor quality goods
- Control was won, but famine then killed millions
- Achieved — yet through terror and a massive human cost
| State (region) | Key economic policy | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Nazi Germany (Europe) | Four-Year Plan 1936, rearmament | Unemployment fell; consumer goods scarce; autarky incomplete |
| USSR (Europe) | Five-Year Plans from 1928; collectivisation | Heavy industry boomed; Holodomor famine 1932-33 |
| Mao's China (Asia) | Great Leap Forward 1958-62 | Industrial targets faked; famine killed tens of millions |
Mini-case: the Ukrainian Holodomor, 1932-33: Stalin's forced collectivisation kept seizing grain even as whole villages starved. The Holodomor killed millions of people in Ukraine. The aim of state control over food was met; the result was mass death. This is the textbook case of an aim achieved at a catastrophic human cost.
Never wonder what to study next
Get a personalized daily plan based on your exam date, progress, and weak areas. We'll tell you exactly what to review each day.
How this is tested (Paper 2): Paper 2 is a comparative essay with no sources. You must use two authoritarian states from different IB regions, for example Stalin's USSR (Europe) and Mao's China (Asia). The top markbands reward clear judgement about whether aims met results, not just storytelling.
Examine the aims and results of the economic policies of two authoritarian states, each chosen from a different region.
Model answer plan
See the mark-by-mark plan — for / against / judgement, with marking guidance — in study mode.
Common mistakes: Do not pick two states from the same region, such as Hitler and Stalin who are both in Europe, because that caps your marks. Do not narrate each country separately, and never list policies without judging their results. Always include the human cost.