In a nutshell: An editorial is a newspaper's official opinion — an unsigned argument, in a confident ‘we’ voice, that takes a clear stance and usually pushes for change.
Most of a paper reports the news. One column judges it.
“This paper has stayed quiet for long enough. The potholes on our streets are not an inconvenience — they are a disgrace, and the council knows it.”
That's an editorial: no byline, speaking for the whole paper, taking a side and telling you what should happen. Analyse how it argues.
What to look for
A clear stance
It picks a side early and stays there — no ‘on the other hand’ wavering.
The ‘we’ / institutional voice
It speaks for the whole paper, which sounds authoritative and shared.
Rhetorical devices
Loaded words, contrast, rhetorical questions and lists drive the argument.
A call to action or judgement
It ends by demanding change or delivering a verdict.
The key move: Ask ‘what is its line, and how does it push me to agree?’ An editorial is built to persuade — track the loaded words and the confident voice that carry its stance.
Free preview
This is the free notes preview
You're reading the free notes. Aimnova Pro unlocks the full study experience — and you can try it with your first topic free to keep:
- FlashcardsLock in vocabulary and key terms with spaced repetition.
- Practice questionsAnswer exam-style questions and get instant AI marking.
- Mock exams & past-paper vaultSit full mocks and see exactly how examiners award marks.
- Personalised study planA daily plan built around your exam date and weak areas.
Why it matters in the exam: Editorials appear in Paper 1. A strong answer analyses the persuasive techniques — the confident ‘we’, loaded language, rhetorical questions — and how they build the paper's argument.
Analyse how this opening of an editorial argues the newspaper's stance.
Model answer plan
See the mark-by-mark plan — for / against / judgement, with marking guidance — in study mode.
Watch out: Don't mistake an editorial for a neutral news report. It has a stance — your job is to analyse how it argues that stance, not to summarise the issue.