The big idea: Everything this topic has raised — power, access, whose knowledge counts — now runs through one force: technology. This micro ties the whole topic together.
The question that ties it together
- With a phone you can read more than any king once could.
- So does technology finally SHARE knowledge with everyone?
- Or does it hand even more power to those who already had it?
Technology is the great engine for spreading knowledge, so it decides who gains access — and whether the gaps between people get smaller or larger.
Free preview
This is the free notes preview
You're reading the free notes. Aimnova Pro unlocks the full study experience — and you can try it with your first topic free to keep:
- FlashcardsLock in vocabulary and key terms with spaced repetition.
- Practice questionsAnswer exam-style questions and get instant AI marking.
- Mock exams & past-paper vaultSit full mocks and see exactly how examiners award marks.
- Personalised study planA daily plan built around your exam date and weak areas.
The evidence genuinely cuts both ways, so lay the two answers side by side before judging.
Technology NARROWS the gap
- Free encyclopedias and courses reach billions
- A cheap phone can out-read a whole old library
- Distant learners access the same lectures as the richest
Technology WIDENS the gap
- No device or signal = shut out entirely (the digital divide)
- Paywalls, patents and algorithms decide what you see
- Those who already had power own the platforms
Checkpoint — the tension: In one line: technology can either narrow the knowledge gap or widen it — and which one happens depends on power and access, not the gadget itself. Hold that — it's the whole topic in a nutshell.
Get feedback like a real examiner
Submit your answers and get instant feedback — what you did well, what's missing, and exactly what to write to score full marks.
Go further — higher-level insight: See how technology gathers up every earlier micro. Showing that technology is where all three earlier threads meet is a top-band synthesis.
Three threads meet in technology
- Power/knowledge (Foucault): technology is its newest form — whoever owns the platform shapes what you know.
- Access as a right (Article 27): technology is where it is won or lost.
- Epistemic injustice: algorithms can quietly commit it, burying some voices and boosting others.
The move that scores: In Paper 1 §B you don't just describe technology's effects. You argue a claim about it, test it against the other side, weigh them, and reach a reasoned conclusion. That doing philosophy is what the markbands reward.
How Section B works: Section B is a straight essay on your optional theme [25] — NO stimulus. You're given a claim and asked to Evaluate or Discuss it.
The whole skill
Argue a view
Argue the view you hold, using thinkers from the topic as evidence.
Test it
Test it against the strongest objection.
Weigh them
Weigh your view and the objection against each other.
Conclude
Reach a reasoned conclusion.
Argue → Test → Weigh → Conclude
Evaluate the claim that technology narrows inequalities in access to knowledge.
Model answer plan
See the mark-by-mark plan — for / against / judgement, with marking guidance — in study mode.
Common mistakes: 1. Describing technology's effects instead of arguing the claim. 2. Only one side — top bands need the objection. 3. No thinkers — bring in Foucault, Fricker, Article 27 as evidence. 4. No conclusion — decide, with a reason. 5. Name-dropping — a name earns nothing without its argument.