Free preview
This is the free notes preview
You're reading the free notes. In My Learning the same topic also comes with:
- FlashcardsLock in vocabulary and key terms with spaced repetition.
- Practice questionsAnswer exam-style questions and get instant AI marking.
- Mock exams & past-paper vaultSit full mocks and see exactly how examiners award marks.
- Personalised study planA daily plan built around your exam date and weak areas.
The big idea: Between about 1450 and 1789 many European rulers pulled power away from nobles, towns and the Church, and gathered it into their own hands.
The most ambitious version was absolutism: the idea that one monarch should be the single source of law and the final word on everything.
Absolutism rested on a powerful theory — divine right. If God chose the king, then to disobey the king was almost to disobey God.
Thinkers like the Frenchman Bossuet taught that the monarch answered to God alone, not to parliaments or nobles.
King Louis XIV of France (ruled 1643–1715) became the model absolute ruler. He supposedly said l'état, c'est moi — 'I am the state'.
In practice no king could do literally anything he liked, but the ambition was clear: the ruler as sole source of law and final authority.
From coercion to control: the standing army: To enforce his will a ruler needed force he could trust. Medieval kings borrowed troops from nobles; absolute rulers built their own standing army — professional soldiers paid and commanded by the crown, kept even in peacetime.
This was part of the military revolution. Gunpowder artillery could smash the stone castles nobles once sheltered behind, so private lords could no longer defy the king.
Armies also grew huge — France fielded perhaps 400,000 men by the 1690s — and only the state was rich enough to pay for them.
Professional troops
Full-time, paid, uniformed soldiers loyal to the crown — not part-time levies raised by nobles.
Gunpowder artillery
Cannon that could destroy castle walls, ending the military independence of the old nobility.
Larger forces
Armies swelled into the hundreds of thousands, far beyond what any single lord could afford.
Royal control of force
The king held a near-monopoly on organised violence, the ultimate foundation of central power.
A standing army = a monarch who no longer needs to ask the nobles for muscle.
An army is useless without money to pay it, and money needs officials to collect it. So absolute rulers built two things together: a bureaucracy to run the state and a tax system to fund it.
These were the everyday machinery of central power.
Bureaucracy: the king's own officials: Instead of leaving local government to independent nobles, rulers appointed their own intendants and provincial governors.
These men owed everything to the crown, kept written records, enforced royal orders, and reported back to the centre.
One clever, and messy, way to staff and fund the state was venality. The crown sold official jobs to raise money fast, and buyers gained status and income.
The downside: officials could pass jobs to their heirs, so the king slowly lost control of his own administration.
Taxation: filling the treasury: States taxed in two main ways. Direct taxes were charged straight on people or land — like the French taille. Indirect taxes were hidden in the price of goods — like the gabelle.
Direct taxes
- Charged directly on a person, their land or income
- Example: the French taille
- Nobles and clergy were often exempt, so it fell on the poor
- Visible and resented, but predictable for the crown
Indirect taxes
- Hidden inside the price of goods people buy
- Example: the gabelle (salt) and customs duties
- Everyone pays, including the exempt classes
- Easier to raise quietly, but fuelled smuggling and revolt
Governments also followed mercantilism. Louis XIV's minister Colbert built up French industry, roads and trade so the state would grow richer and stronger.
Even so, kings never had enough cash and leaned heavily on private money-men.
- Financiers — private lenders who advanced cash to the crown, for a profit.
- Tax farming — the crown sold the right to collect a tax to a private company, which kept whatever extra it squeezed out.
- The trade-off — the king got money now, but paid dearly later and angered taxpayers gouged by the tax farmers.
Money is the engine: Army, bureaucracy and court all cost enormous sums. Reliable taxes and credit were what let a ruler act absolute — and constant money shortages were the crack that eventually broke states like France.
Study smarter, not longer
Most students waste 40% of study time on topics they already know. Our AI tracks your progress and optimizes every minute.
Raw force and taxes were not enough — a ruler also had to tame the nobility, the class most likely to rebel. The cleverest tool for this was the royal court.
Instead of crushing nobles, Louis XIV dazzled and domesticated them.
Versailles: a golden cage: From the 1680s Louis XIV moved his court to the vast palace of Versailles and required the great nobles to live there.
At Versailles they competed for the king's favour through patronage, ceremony and display — and while they chased royal smiles, they could not plot rebellion in their provinces.
Everything at court was ritual. Elaborate ceremonies — even watching the king wake up and dress — turned daily life into a performance that revolved around the monarch.
This display made the king seem almost superhuman, reinforcing his authority far more cheaply than an army.
Religion and the state: Rulers also used the Church to legitimise their power and unite their people. If everyone worshipped the same way, obedience to God and obedience to the king felt like one thing.
In France this meant Gallicanism. Louis XIV appointed bishops and drew on Church wealth and preaching to support the throne.
Elsewhere, states set up established churches — an official national faith backed by law.
Control of the Church
Rulers appointed bishops and taxed Church wealth, turning the clergy into partners of the state rather than rivals.
An official faith
One established religion (e.g. Catholicism in France, Anglicanism in England) tied national identity to loyalty to the crown.
Treatment of minorities
Religious minorities were often pushed out. Louis XIV revoked the Edict of Nantes in 1685, stripping French Protestants (Huguenots) of their rights.
The limits of these tools: Each method had a price. Persecuting the Huguenots drove skilled workers abroad and hurt the economy; Versailles cost a fortune; venal officials became hard to sack.
Strong essays note that consolidating power also created new weaknesses.