aimnova.
DashboardMy LearningPaper MasteryStudy Plan

Stay in the loop

Study tips, product updates, and early access to new features.

aimnova.

AI-powered IB study platform with personalised plans, instant feedback, and examiner-style marking.

IB Subjects
  • All IB Subjects
  • IB Diploma
  • IB ESS
  • IB Economics
  • IB Business Management
  • IB Math AI
  • IB Math AA
  • IB Physics
  • IB Biology
  • IB Chemistry
  • IB History
  • IB Geography
  • IB Spanish B
  • IB German B
  • IB Italian B
  • IB French B
  • IB English B
Question Banks
  • ESS Question Bank
  • Economics Question Bank
  • Business Management Question Bank
  • Math AI Question Bank
  • Math AA Question Bank
  • Physics Question Bank
  • Biology Question Bank
  • Chemistry Question Bank
  • History Question Bank
  • Geography Question Bank
  • Spanish B Question Bank
  • German B Question Bank
  • Italian B Question Bank
  • French B Question Bank
  • English B Question Bank
Predicted Topics 2026
  • ESS Predictions 2026
  • Economics Predictions 2026
  • Business Management Predictions 2026
  • Math AI Predictions 2026
  • Math AA Predictions 2026
  • Physics Predictions 2026
  • Biology Predictions 2026
  • Chemistry Predictions 2026
  • History Predictions 2026
  • Geography Predictions 2026
  • Spanish B Predictions 2026
  • German B Predictions 2026
  • Italian B Predictions 2026
  • French B Predictions 2026
  • English B Predictions 2026

Study Resources

  • Free Study Notes
  • Mock Exams
  • Revision Guide
  • Flashcards
  • Exam Skills
  • Command Terms
  • Past Paper Feedback
  • Grade Calculator
  • Exam Timetable 2026

Company

  • Features
  • Pricing
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Cookies

© 2026 Aimnova. All rights reserved.

Made with 💜 for IB students worldwide

v0.1.1485
NotesHistoryTopic 17.1Arms race, détente and the end of the Cold War
Back to History Topics
17.1.34 min read

Arms race, détente and the end of the Cold War

IB History • Unit 17

IB exam ready

Study like the top scorers do

Access a smart study planner, AI tutor, and exam vault — everything you need to hit your target grade.

Start Free Trial

Contents

  • The nuclear arms race and MAD
  • Détente and the Second Cold War
  • Gorbachev and the collapse, 1985–1991

Free preview

This is the free notes preview

You're reading the free notes. In My Learning the same topic also comes with:

Start free
  • FlashcardsLock in vocabulary and key terms with spaced repetition.
  • Practice questionsAnswer exam-style questions and get instant AI marking.
  • Mock exams & past-paper vaultSit full mocks and see exactly how examiners award marks.
  • Personalised study planA daily plan built around your exam date and weak areas.
The big idea: The USA and USSR built enough nuclear weapons to destroy the world many times over.

Strangely, this deadly balance helped keep the peace — neither side dared strike first.

In 1945 the USA was the only country with the atomic bomb. This gave it a huge advantage, and the Soviet Union felt threatened and exposed.

But that lead did not last long. In 1949 the USSR tested its own atomic bomb, shocking America and starting a race that would last for decades.

  • US atomic monopoly (1945–1949) — for four years only America had the bomb, which it had used on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945.
  • Soviet A-bomb (1949) — the USSR caught up far sooner than the West expected, ending the American monopoly.
  • The hydrogen bomb — the USA tested the far more powerful H-bomb in 1952; the USSR followed in 1953, raising the stakes hugely.
  • The delivery race — both sides raced to build long-range bombers and then missiles to carry these warheads across the world.

The hydrogen bomb was a terrifying leap. A single one could wipe out an entire city in an instant.

Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD): By the 1960s both sides could destroy each other even after being hit first.

This grim balance was called Mutually Assured Destruction, or MAD. Because attacking meant your own certain death, neither superpower ever pressed the button.

MAD is a strange idea, but it may have kept the Cold War 'cold'. The fear of total destruction made both sides very careful, especially after the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 scared the world.

Why MAD mattered: MAD explains why the two superpowers competed everywhere else — spies, sport, space, proxy wars — but never fought each other directly. A direct war would have destroyed them both.

By the early 1970s both superpowers were exhausted and worried. Nuclear weapons were hugely expensive, and the fear of destruction was constant.

So they tried something new — talking instead of threatening. This easing of tension was called détente.

1

SALT I (1972)

The Strategic Arms Limitation Talks led to the first big agreement to limit the number of nuclear missiles each side could keep. It did not cut weapons, but it stopped the race growing endlessly.

2

The ABM Treaty (1972)

Signed alongside SALT I, this limited each side's anti-missile defences. The clever logic was that if neither could defend itself, neither would risk a first strike — MAD stayed in place.

3

The Helsinki Accords (1975)

35 nations agreed to accept Europe's existing borders and to respect human rights. The West accepted Soviet control of Eastern Europe; in return, the USSR promised freedoms it would later be pressured to honour.

4

Better dialogue

Leaders now met at summits, signed deals, and even cooperated in space. The tone of the Cold War softened for most of the 1970s.

Détente = talk, treaties, and trust: SALT, ABM, Helsinki.

The Helsinki human-rights trap: The USSR signed Helsinki mainly to win acceptance of its borders. But by promising to respect human rights, it gave its own critics — like Soviet dissidents — a powerful weapon to hold the government to its word.

Détente did not last. At the end of the 1970s tension flared again, in what historians call the Second Cold War.

Détente (1970s) — tension easing

  • SALT I limits nuclear missiles (1972)
  • ABM Treaty preserves the MAD balance (1972)
  • Helsinki accepts Europe's borders (1975)
  • Regular summits and warmer dialogue

Second Cold War (early 1980s) — tension returning

  • Soviet invasion of Afghanistan (1979)
  • USA boycotts the 1980 Moscow Olympics
  • Reagan's huge arms build-up
  • Reagan calls the USSR an 'Evil Empire' (1983)
The turning point: Afghanistan, 1979: In December 1979 the USSR invaded Afghanistan to prop up a friendly communist government. The West was furious, saw it as aggressive expansion, and détente collapsed almost overnight.

The new US President, Ronald Reagan, took a hard line from 1981. He massively increased military spending and used tough language, famously calling the Soviet Union an 'Evil Empire' in 1983.

Why the mood changed: Afghanistan destroyed Western trust, and Reagan's build-up piled pressure on the Soviet economy. This costly new rivalry set the stage for a leader who wanted to end it — Mikhail Gorbachev.

Study smarter, not longer

Most students waste 40% of study time on topics they already know. Our AI tracks your progress and optimizes every minute.

Try Smart Study Free7-day free trial • No card required

In 1985 a new, younger leader took charge of the USSR — Mikhail Gorbachev. He inherited a country that was falling behind and could no longer afford the arms race.

Gorbachev believed the only way to save the Soviet Union was to reform it. His ideas would end up ending the Cold War altogether.

  • Glasnost — glasnost allowed people to criticise the government for the first time in decades.
  • Perestroika — perestroika tried to fix the failing, over-controlled Soviet economy.
  • 'New Thinking' — Gorbachev's new approach to foreign policy: cooperate with the West and stop treating it as an enemy.
  • Less control abroad — he told Eastern European countries the USSR would no longer send troops to keep communist governments in power.
The INF Treaty (1987): Gorbachev and Reagan built a real friendship. In 1987 they signed the INF Treaty, the first deal to actually destroy a whole category of nuclear weapons rather than just limit them. It was a huge breakthrough.

Once people knew Soviet tanks would not roll in, the peoples of Eastern Europe rose up. The year 1989 saw one communist government fall after another, mostly peacefully.

1

The revolutions of 1989

Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia and others threw off communist rule during 1989. Because Gorbachev refused to intervene, the old Soviet grip on Eastern Europe simply melted away.

2

The Berlin Wall falls (Nov 1989)

The Wall had split Berlin since 1961 and was the great symbol of the divided world. On 9 November 1989 crowds broke through and began tearing it down — the Cold War's most famous image.

3

German reunification (1990)

With the Wall gone, East and West Germany joined back together as one country in October 1990. The division of Germany, where the Cold War began, was over.

4

The USSR collapses (1991)

Reforms unleashed forces Gorbachev could not control. In December 1991 the Soviet Union broke apart into separate independent countries, and the Cold War was finally over.

1989 revolutions → Wall falls → Germany reunites (1990) → USSR collapses (1991).

A key debate: Historians argue about who ended the Cold War. Some credit Reagan's tough pressure, which bankrupted the USSR. Others credit Gorbachev's reforms and 'New Thinking'. Most agree it took both — plus the Soviet economy's own deep weakness.

Gorbachev won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1990 for helping end the Cold War peacefully. Yet at home he is often blamed for the collapse of his own country.

IB Exam Questions on Arms race, détente and the end of the Cold War

Practice with IB-style questions filtered to Topic 17.1.3. Get instant AI feedback on every answer.

Practice Topic 17.1.3 QuestionsBrowse All History Topics

How Arms race, détente and the end of the Cold War Appears in IB Exams

Examiners use specific command terms when asking about this topic. Here's what to expect:

Define

Give the precise meaning of key terms related to Arms race, détente and the end of the Cold War.

AO1
Describe

Give a detailed account of processes or features in Arms race, détente and the end of the Cold War.

AO2
Explain

Give reasons WHY — cause and effect within Arms race, détente and the end of the Cold War.

AO3
Evaluate

Weigh strengths AND limitations of approaches in Arms race, détente and the end of the Cold War.

AO3
Discuss

Present arguments FOR and AGAINST with a balanced conclusion.

AO3

See the full IB Command Terms guide →

Related History Topics

Continue learning with these related topics from the same unit:

17.1.1Origins: ideology and the breakdown of the wartime alliance
17.1.2Confrontation in Europe: containment, Berlin and the alliances
17.2.1US leaders and the policies of the United States
17.2.2Soviet leaders and the policies of the USSR
View all History topics

Improve your exam technique

Command terms, paper structure, and mark-scheme tips for History

Previous
17.1.2Confrontation in Europe: containment, Berlin and the alliances
Next
US leaders and the policies of the United States17.2.1

15 practice questions on Arms race, détente and the end of the Cold War

Students who practiced this topic on Aimnova scored 82% on average. Try free practice questions and get instant AI feedback.

Try 3 Free QuestionsView All History Topics