Free preview
This is the free notes preview
You're reading the free notes. In My Learning the same topic also comes with:
- FlashcardsLock in vocabulary and key terms with spaced repetition.
- Practice questionsAnswer exam-style questions and get instant AI marking.
- Mock exams & past-paper vaultSit full mocks and see exactly how examiners award marks.
- Personalised study planA daily plan built around your exam date and weak areas.
The big idea: Everyone expected a short, fast war. Instead, by the end of 1914 the Western Front had frozen into two lines of trenches stretching from the Belgian coast to Switzerland.
New weapons made defending easy and attacking deadly, so the war became one of attrition — grinding the enemy down rather than winning quick, decisive battles.
In August 1914 Germany's Schlieffen Plan aimed to knock out France in six weeks. It failed at the Battle of the Marne in September 1914, when French and British armies halted the German advance near Paris.
Both sides then dug in to hold their ground. The result was a stalemate: a deadlocked front where neither side could push the other back.
- Machine guns — could fire hundreds of bullets a minute, cutting down soldiers who tried to cross open ground, so any attack across no man's land was slaughter.
- Artillery — big guns firing shells were the biggest killers of the war; huge bombardments were meant to smash enemy trenches before an attack, but rarely destroyed them completely.
- Poison gas — first used by Germany at Ypres in 1915; it blinded and choked men, but wind could blow it back and gas masks soon reduced its effect.
- Tanks — introduced by Britain at the Somme in 1916; early ones were slow and broke down often, but they hinted at how future wars would break the deadlock.
- Aircraft — used mainly for reconnaissance (spying on enemy positions) and directing artillery, with fighters and bombers developing later in the war.
Why the defence was so strong: The technology of 1914–16 favoured defending, not attacking.
Machine guns, barbed wire and pre-aimed artillery let a small number of defenders stop a large attacking force. This is why battles produced enormous casualties but almost no movement of the front line.
| Battle (1916) | Who attacked | Rough casualties (both sides) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Somme | Britain and France attacked Germany | Over 1 million | A few miles gained; huge losses on the first day |
| Verdun | Germany attacked France | Around 700,000 | France held; Germany failed to 'bleed France white' |
Use these two battles as evidence: The Somme and Verdun are your go-to examples of attrition. In an essay, use them to show that WWI battles cost hundreds of thousands of lives while barely moving the front — proof that this was a war of endurance, not of clever manoeuvres.
The war was not only fought in the trenches. Control of the sea decided which side could feed its people and keep its armies supplied.
Britain's powerful Royal Navy used its strength to strangle Germany economically, while Germany hit back beneath the waves with submarines.
The British blockade
From 1914 the Royal Navy blocked ships carrying food and raw materials to Germany. Over time this caused severe shortages and hunger among German civilians, badly weakening the home front.
The Battle of Jutland (1916)
The war's only major clash of battleships. Germany sank more ships but then retreated to port and stayed there — so Britain kept command of the sea and the blockade continued.
German U-boat warfare
Germany used U-boats to sink ships bringing supplies to Britain, trying to starve Britain out the way the blockade was starving Germany.
Blockade squeezes Germany · Jutland keeps Britain in charge · U-boats try to squeeze Britain back
Unrestricted submarine warfare — a fatal gamble: In 1917 Germany declared unrestricted submarine warfare, meaning U-boats would sink any ship — including neutral American ones — heading for Britain.
It was a gamble to win before US supplies mattered. Instead it helped push the neutral USA into the war on the Allied side.
WWI was also the first total war — a war that used a nation's entire population and economy, not just its soldiers.
Governments took control of their economies, told factories what to make, and directed millions of ordinary people towards the war effort.
- Conscription — governments forced men into the armed forces by law (Britain introduced it in 1916) to replace the huge numbers killed.
- War economies — states directed industry, rationed food and controlled prices so resources went to the war rather than to ordinary shopping.
- Munitions production — factories were switched to making shells, guns and equipment; shortages early on led to the British 'Shell Crisis' of 1915.
- Civilian involvement — with men at the front, women took over factory, transport and farm jobs, keeping the war economy running at home.
Home front = second battlefield: In a total war, the side that can out-produce and out-supply the other has a huge advantage.
That is why the blockade mattered so much: it attacked Germany's ability to fight by starving its people and its factories.
Practice with real exam questions
Answer exam-style questions and get AI feedback that shows you exactly what examiners want to see in a full-marks response.
By 1917 the war had become a global struggle of resources, and two huge events changed the balance in opposite directions.
The United States joined the Allies, while Russia dropped out — but the timing worked in the Allies' favour.
USA joins the Allies (April 1917)
- Angered by unrestricted U-boat attacks on its ships
- The Zimmermann Telegram: Germany secretly urged Mexico to attack the USA
- Brought fresh troops, money, food and vast industrial power
- US strength grew steadily through 1918, tipping the balance to the Allies
Russia leaves the war (1917–18)
- The 1917 Bolshevik Revolution brought Lenin's communists to power
- They wanted peace to secure their new government at home
- The 1918 Treaty of Brest-Litovsk made peace with Germany
- This freed German troops to move west for one last big attack
Germany's last gamble: the 1918 Spring Offensive: With Russia beaten, Germany moved its eastern armies west and launched a massive attack in spring 1918, racing to win before American forces arrived in full.
It made big early gains but ran out of fresh men and supplies. Once it stalled, the Allies — now strengthened by US troops — counter-attacked and drove Germany back until it asked for an armistice in November 1918.
So why did the Allies ultimately win? It was less about one clever battle and more about long-term advantages finally taking effect.
Three factors stand out, and they connect everything from the earlier sections together.
Manpower and resource superiority
With the British and French empires, and then the USA, the Allies simply had more men, more money, more food and more industry than Germany and its partners could match.
The effect of the blockade
Years of the British naval blockade left Germany short of food and raw materials. Hunger and shortages wrecked morale on the home front and starved the war economy.
Failure of the 1918 Spring Offensive
Germany's final all-out attack failed. Exhausted and outnumbered, its army could not recover, and this collapse opened the way to the Allied victory.
Link the causes together: These reasons are connected, not separate. The blockade weakened Germany over years; US entry boosted Allied strength; and the failed Spring Offensive used up Germany's last reserves — so Allied superiority in men and resources finally decided the war.