Free preview
This is the free notes preview
You're reading the free notes. In My Learning the same topic also comes with:
- FlashcardsLock in vocabulary and key terms with spaced repetition.
- Practice questionsAnswer exam-style questions and get instant AI marking.
- Mock exams & past-paper vaultSit full mocks and see exactly how examiners award marks.
- Personalised study planA daily plan built around your exam date and weak areas.
The big idea: Winning democracy is one thing. Keeping it alive when times get hard is another.
In the twentieth century two democracies — Weimar Germany and the USA — were battered by economic crisis, political extremism and scandal. One collapsed. The other bent but survived. Comparing them shows us what makes a democracy strong or fragile.
A challenge to democracy is anything that threatens either its survival (does the system still exist?) or its quality (is it still fair, free and trusted?). Some threats come from outside the government — a stock-market crash, mass unemployment, extremist parties.
Others come from inside — leaders who abuse power, spread fear, or break the law.
- Economic crisis — a slump like the Great Depression throws millions out of work and makes people lose faith in democracy
- Political extremism — parties of the far right or far left that want to destroy democracy rather than compete fairly inside it
- Abuse of power — leaders using fear (McCarthyism) or breaking the law (Watergate)
- The media — mass communication that can either inform citizens or be turned into propaganda
Two kinds of challenge
- External: crises that hit from outside — the 1929 crash, mass unemployment
- External: extremist parties competing for votes (Nazis, Communists)
- External: hostile foreign powers stirring up fear (the Cold War for the USA)
The test each one poses
- Internal: can the constitution survive being stretched (Weimar's Article 48)?
- Internal: will leaders respect the rule of law, or abuse power (McCarthy, Nixon)?
- Internal: is public trust in government strong enough to take the blow?
Spot it: survival vs quality: Ask two questions of every challenge. Did democracy survive it (Weimar: no; the USA: yes)? And did it damage democracy's quality — its fairness and the public's trust — even where the system survived?
The Weimar Republic was born after Germany's defeat in the First World War. On paper it had one of the most democratic constitutions in the world.
In practice it was fragile from the start — blamed for a humiliating peace treaty, weakened by economic shocks, and built with a fatal design flaw.
Weak coalition government
Weimar used pure proportional representation, so the parliament (Reichstag) was split into many small parties. No single party could govern alone, so weak coalitions formed and fell apart again and again — governments rarely lasted more than a year.
The Great Depression hits (1929)
When Wall Street crashed in 1929, American loans propping up Germany were pulled. Unemployment rocketed to around 6 million by 1932. Desperate, frightened voters abandoned the moderate parties.
Rule by Article 48
Article 48 of the constitution let the President rule by emergency decree without the Reichstag. From 1930 Chancellor Brüning governed this way — so democracy was already being bypassed years before Hitler.
Extremists surge
In the crisis the Nazis grew from 12 seats in 1928 to the largest party by July 1932. The Communists also grew. Together, two parties that wanted to destroy democracy held a majority of Reichstag seats.
The Nazi seizure of power (1933)
On 30 January 1933 President Hindenburg appointed Hitler Chancellor, wrongly believing conservatives could control him. Within months the Enabling Act let Hitler make laws without parliament — Weimar democracy was dead.
Weak coalitions + Depression + Article 48 + extremism → the 1933 seizure of power.
Why Article 48 mattered so much: Article 48 was meant for emergencies only. But once the Depression hit, chancellors used it as a normal way to govern because the Reichstag was deadlocked.
This is the key point: democracy was hollowed out from the inside by legal emergency powers before the Nazis abolished it. Germany got used to being ruled by decree, which made dictatorship feel less shocking.
The Depression and Weimar together: The Depression did not just cause poverty — it destroyed faith in the democratic system itself. Moderate parties had no answer to 6 million unemployed.
Extremists offered simple, angry solutions and someone to blame. In hard times, voters flocked to them. That is how an economic crisis became a political crisis that killed the republic.
| Year | Event | Why it weakened democracy |
|---|---|---|
| 1919 | Weimar Constitution | Proportional representation guaranteed weak coalitions |
| 1929 | Great Depression begins | Mass unemployment; voters desert moderate parties |
| 1930 | Rule by Article 48 starts | Parliament sidelined; government by emergency decree |
| 1932 | Nazis become largest party | Anti-democratic parties hold a Reichstag majority |
| 1933 | Hitler made Chancellor; Enabling Act | Legal end of democracy — dictatorship begins |
Learn what examiners really want
See exactly what to write to score full marks. Our AI shows you model answers and the key phrases examiners look for.
The USA faced its own tests, yet its democracy survived every one. The difference between the American and German stories is at the heart of this topic.
The USA weathered the same Great Depression, plus two crises of its own: the McCarthyite red scare of the 1950s and the Watergate scandal of the 1970s.
The Great Depression in the USA
The 1929 Wall Street Crash threw around a quarter of Americans out of work. But instead of turning to extremists, voters elected Franklin Roosevelt, whose New Deal used democratic government to fight the slump. Reform, not revolution — democracy adapted and held.
McCarthyism (early 1950s)
During the Cold War, Senator Joseph McCarthy claimed communists had infiltrated the government. His unproven accusations ruined careers and spread fear. It damaged democracy's quality — free speech and fair process — but the system corrected itself: McCarthy was discredited and censured by the Senate in 1954.
Watergate (1972–74)
President Nixon's team broke into the Democrats' offices, and Nixon then tried to cover it up — an abuse of presidential power. Congress, the courts and a free press exposed him. Facing impeachment, Nixon resigned in 1974. The system held the president to account.
The media: friend and foe of democracy: The media can cut both ways. In Nazi Germany, radio and press became propaganda tools that crushed free debate — a challenge to democracy.
But in the USA, a free press was democracy's defender: journalists at the Washington Post helped expose Watergate. Mass communication threatens democracy when the state controls it, and protects it when it is free.
Why did the USA survive where Weimar fell?: The USA had deep, long-established democratic institutions — an independent Congress, independent courts, and a free press — that could check a lawbreaking president or a fear-mongering senator.
Weimar democracy was young, distrusted, and undermined by emergency rule before extremism finished it off. Strong institutions and public trust made the difference.
Weimar Germany — democracy collapsed
- Young, distrusted democracy blamed for defeat and Versailles
- Weak coalitions; then normalised rule by Article 48 decree
- Extremists gained a majority and legally destroyed the system
- State-controlled media became propaganda
USA — democracy survived
- Long-established democracy with deep public loyalty
- Independent Congress and courts checked abuses of power
- Reform (the New Deal) answered the crisis instead of revolution
- A free press exposed wrongdoing (Watergate)