On 6 April 1994, a plane carrying President Habyarimana of Rwanda was shot down over Kigali. Within hours, killing squads were on the streets. Nobody has ever proven for certain who fired the missile — but Hutu extremists used the death as their trigger.
What followed was one of the fastest, most organised mass killings of the 20th century. In just 100 days, around 800,000 people were murdered — most of them Tutsi, along with moderate Hutu who refused to take part.
This was not sudden chaos: The genocide had been planned for months. Weapons had been stockpiled, kill lists prepared, and hatred deliberately built up through radio and newspapers. That planning is central to why it is called a genocide — the deliberate, organised destruction of a group.
- Interahamwe — 'those who attack together', a Hutu militia trained and armed in the years before 1994; they carried out most of the killing at roadblocks and in churches, often using machetes
- RTLM radio — Radio Television Libre des Mille Collines broadcast anti-Tutsi hate speech, called Tutsi 'inyenzi', and even read out names and addresses of people to be killed
- Kangura magazine — had spread anti-Tutsi propaganda since 1990, including the 'Hutu Ten Commandments' urging Hutu to see Tutsi as the enemy
- Local officials and ordinary citizens — mayors, police, and many neighbours joined in; the killing spread into almost every community, not just the capital
The Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), a mostly-Tutsi rebel army based in Uganda and led by Paul Kagame, restarted its civil-war offensive as the killing spread. It fought its way across the country and captured Kigali in July 1994, ending the genocide by force rather than diplomacy.
Cause and consequence link: The genocide did not happen in isolation. It grew out of colonial-era Belgian policies that hardened Hutu/Tutsi into rigid, unequal identities, the 1990-1993 civil war between the RPF and the government, and the Arusha peace deal that extremists saw as a threat to their power. Habyarimana's death was the spark, not the root cause.
Free preview
This is the free notes preview
You're reading the free notes. Aimnova Pro unlocks the full study experience — and you can try it free for 7 days:
- FlashcardsLock in vocabulary and key terms with spaced repetition.
- Practice questionsAnswer exam-style questions and get instant AI marking.
- Mock exams & past-paper vaultSit full mocks and see exactly how examiners award marks.
- Personalised study planA daily plan built around your exam date and weak areas.
A small UN peacekeeping force, UNAMIR, was already in Rwanda when the killing began. Its commander, Roméo Dallaire, warned his superiors weeks earlier that mass violence was being planned — and asked for permission to seize weapons caches. He was refused.
Once the genocide began, the UN Security Council actually cut UNAMIR's troop numbers instead of increasing them. Many governments avoided the word 'genocide' in public statements, because using it would have created a legal duty to act.
Reasons for international inaction
- Memory of the failed 1993 US mission in Somalia made Western governments wary of African peacekeeping
- Rwanda was seen as strategically unimportant to major powers
- Confused, contradictory reporting made the scale hard to grasp at first
- The UN Security Council (including the US) resisted committing more troops or funding
Signs the world could have acted
- Dallaire's early warnings gave weeks of notice before the mass killing began
- France had troops and influence in Rwanda already, from years of military cooperation
- The genocide was reported by journalists and aid workers as it happened
- The RPF's rapid advance showed the killing could be stopped by force
France's Opération Turquoise: In June 1994, France sent troops into southwest Rwanda in a UN-approved 'humanitarian' mission. It did save some lives, but it also let many genocide leaders and Interahamwe fighters escape into Zaire (later DRC). Critics argue this let the killers survive to fight another day — a direct link to the wars in Congo that followed.
1994
International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) set up in Arusha, Tanzania to prosecute genocide leaders under international law.
1990s-2000s
Gacaca courts — community-based trials using a traditional Rwandan justice system — processed hundreds of thousands of lower-level cases too numerous for the ICTR.
Ongoing
Rwanda pursued national reconciliation policies, including banning ethnic identity cards and promoting a shared 'Rwandan' identity over Hutu/Tutsi labels.
ICTR judged the leaders, gacaca judged the community, reconciliation tried to rebuild the nation.
The ICTR secured important convictions, including of Jean Kambanda, the former prime minister — the first time a head of government was convicted of genocide by an international court. But debates remain over whether the tribunal moved too slowly, cost too much, and delivered too little justice for ordinary victims compared to gacaca.
See how examiners mark answers
Access past paper questions with model answers. Learn exactly what earns marks and what doesn't.
Rwanda's genocide did not stay inside Rwanda's borders. Hutu extremists who fled into Zaire (renamed the Democratic Republic of Congo, DRC, in 1997) regrouped there, and Rwanda's new RPF government helped Laurent Kabila overthrow Zaire's dictator Mobutu in 1997 partly to deal with that threat.
Once in power, Kabila turned against his former backers. He ordered Rwandan and Ugandan troops out of Congo in 1998, fearing they had too much control over his country. Rwanda and Uganda responded by backing a new rebellion against him — starting the Second Congo War.
Africa's World War: Up to nine African states ended up involved. Rwanda and Uganda backed rebel groups against Kabila, while Zimbabwe, Angola, and Namibia sent troops to defend him. That is why historians sometimes call it 'Africa's World War' — the deadliest conflict anywhere since 1945, with an estimated 3 to 5.4 million deaths (mostly from disease and hunger caused by the war, not combat).
| Side | Key backers | Main aim |
|---|---|---|
| Kabila's government | Zimbabwe, Angola, Namibia | Keep Kabila in power; protect their own economic and political interests in Congo |
| Rebel movements (e.g. RCD) | Rwanda, Uganda | Remove Kabila; secure their borders from Hutu militia; gain access to Congo's resources |
Kabila's assassination, January 2001: Laurent Kabila was shot by one of his own bodyguards in January 2001. His son, Joseph Kabila, took over at just 29 years old. The assassination did not end the war, but it opened the door to peace talks, since Joseph Kabila was seen as more willing to negotiate than his father.
- Coltan — a mineral used in mobile phones and electronics; Congo holds a huge share of the world's supply, and armed groups taxed and controlled mines to fund fighting
- Diamonds, gold and cobalt — also looted and smuggled out, often with foreign companies buying minerals without asking hard questions about their source
- UN Panel of Experts — a UN investigation found that Rwandan and Ugandan officials, alongside international companies, profited directly from Congo's mineral wealth during the war
- Resource war — many historians argue that by 1999-2000, control of minerals had become as important a motive for the outside armies as security concerns, extending a war that might otherwise have ended sooner
A formal peace deal was signed in 2002-2003 and foreign armies largely withdrew. But eastern Congo never became fully stable. Dozens of armed militia groups kept fighting over land and minerals, and in 2012 a new Rwandan-backed group called M23 emerged from unresolved tensions left over from the war — a reminder that the Second Congo War's causes were never fully solved, only paused.