By the 1830s the Ottoman Empire was in trouble. It had lost Greece, and Egypt's governor Muhammad Ali had grown so powerful he threatened to march on Istanbul himself. Something had to change.
The sultans' answer was the Tanzimat (Tanzimat) — a 37-year programme of reform running from 1839 to 1876. It was reform ordered from above, by the sultan and his ministers, not demanded by the people below.
Why reform now?: This is a cause and consequence question. Political weakness (military defeats, a rebellious Egypt) pushed the empire to modernize its army and government. But there were religious and social causes too — read on.
- Political factors — the empire needed a stronger, more centralized state to survive against rebellious governors and expansionist neighbours like Russia.
- Religious factors — European powers used the treatment of Christian minorities as an excuse to interfere in Ottoman affairs, so equal rights for non-Muslims (in millets, millet) took away that excuse.
- Social factors — a small class of Western-educated bureaucrats believed the empire had to copy European legal and administrative models to catch up economically and militarily.
- Individuals — reforming ministers like Mustafa Reshid Pasha, Ali Pasha and Fuad Pasha drove policy through two long-serving sultans, Abdulmejid I and then Abdul Aziz.
The programme opened with the 1839 Edict of Gulhane, read aloud in front of foreign ambassadors. It promised every subject — Muslim or not — security of life, honour and property, fair taxation, and fair conscription.
In 1856, after the Crimean War, a second decree — the Islahat Fermani — went further. Non-Muslims could now testify in court, hold government office and serve in the army, in theory as full equals to Muslims.
Link causes to a concept: When you write about 'reasons for the Tanzimat', always tie each reason to political, religious, social, or individual factors — examiners reward that structure directly.
Free preview
This is the free notes preview
You're reading the free notes. Aimnova Pro unlocks the full study experience — and you can try it free for 7 days:
- FlashcardsLock in vocabulary and key terms with spaced repetition.
- Practice questionsAnswer exam-style questions and get instant AI marking.
- Mock exams & past-paper vaultSit full mocks and see exactly how examiners award marks.
- Personalised study planA daily plan built around your exam date and weak areas.
The Tanzimat was not just fine words. It rebuilt Ottoman institutions piece by piece over four decades.
New courts
Secular Nizamiye courts were set up alongside sharia courts, using law codes borrowed partly from France, to handle commercial and criminal cases fairly for all subjects.
New provinces
The 1864 Vilayet Law reorganized local government into provinces (vilayets) with elected councils, aiming for more efficient, less corrupt administration.
New schools
State secondary schools and professional colleges trained a new generation of officials and officers in Western-style subjects, alongside the old religious schools.
New citizenship
The 1869 Nationality Law defined 'Ottoman' as a single legal citizenship, an attempt to bind Muslims and non-Muslims together as one people rather than separate millets.
Courts, provinces, schools, citizenship — the Tanzimat built a modern state on paper, piece by piece.
Sultan Abdul Aziz (reigned 1861–1876) matters here. At first he let Ali Pasha and Fuad Pasha keep running reform as they had under his predecessor.
But these reforming ministers died within a few years — Fuad Pasha in 1869 and Ali Pasha in 1871 — and without them Abdul Aziz ruled more personally — building lavish palaces, borrowing recklessly from European banks, and ignoring calls for a constitution.
Tanzimat achievements
- Legal equality promised regardless of religion
- A more centralized, efficient bureaucracy
- Secular courts and modern schools
- The empire survived several crises intact
Tanzimat limits
- Equality often existed on paper more than in daily life
- Reforms were funded by foreign loans, building crushing debt
- Many conservative Muslims resented favouring non-Muslims
- Reform was imposed from above, with little popular consent
The debate to know: Historians disagree on the Tanzimat's real impact. One view: it modernized and genuinely saved the empire from earlier collapse. The opposing view: it was reform without real power-sharing, and its foreign debts left the empire even more vulnerable to European control by the 1870s.
Memorize terms 3x faster
Smart flashcards show you cards right before you forget them. Perfect for definitions and key concepts.
Abdul Aziz's extravagance and debts triggered a crisis. In 1876 he was deposed, and within months a new sultan, Abdulhamid II, granted the empire's first constitution — the Kanun-i Esasi — creating an elected parliament.
This constitution grew out of the ideas of the Young Ottomans, 1860s–70s intellectuals like Namik Kemal who wanted to blend Islamic tradition with European liberal government. But Abdulhamid II suspended the parliament within two years and ruled as an autocrat for the next thirty.
Enter the CUP: Opposition to Abdulhamid II's autocracy grew among students, exiles and — crucially — army officers, especially in the Balkans. By the 1890s they had organized into the secret Committee of Union and Progress (CUP), also called the Young Turks.
- Ideological factors — CUP members mixed constitutionalism, Ottoman patriotism and, increasingly, Turkish nationalist ideas influenced by European thought.
- Political factors — decades of censorship and repression under Abdulhamid II radicalized a generation of officials and intellectuals.
- Military factors — army officers resented poor pay, corruption and being outmatched by rival Balkan states; many joined CUP cells in Macedonia.
In July 1908, CUP-linked officers including Enver Bey mutinied in Macedonia and threatened to march on the capital. Rather than risk civil war, Abdulhamid II restored the 1876 constitution — the Young Turk Revolution.
The Second Constitutional Era (1908–1913) that followed brought real political reform: a free press, competing political parties, and an elected parliament with non-Muslim as well as Muslim deputies. For a moment, Ottomanism — equal citizenship for all — looked like it might work.
That hope collapsed fast. The 1911–12 Italo-Turkish War lost Libya, and the 1912–13 Balkan Wars stripped away almost all remaining Ottoman territory in Europe. The government looked weak and humiliated.
The 1913 coup d'etat: In January 1913, CUP officers stormed the Sublime Porte (the government headquarters), shot the war minister, and forced the cabinet to resign. Power passed to a CUP-only regime dominated by three men — Enver, Talat and Cemal, the 'Three Pashas'.
This was a huge shift: from a pluralist, multi-party experiment to one-party military dictatorship in barely five years. Growing nationalism replaced the earlier Ottomanist optimism, and the CUP grew increasingly authoritarian and hostile to non-Turkish minorities as WWI approached — a policy that turned violent with the Armenian deportations and massacres of 1915.