๐ฒ Price Discrimination
Definition: Price discrimination.
Conditions required
- Market power โ the firm must be a price maker (downward-sloping demand curve).
- Ability to segment the market โ the firm must identify groups with different willingness to pay.
- Prevention of resale (arbitrage) โ consumers who buy cheaply must not be able to resell to those charged more.
Common examples: Student discounts (cinema, transport), peak vs off-peak pricing (electricity, flights), age-based pricing, geographic pricing (different prices in different countries for software/streaming).
Free preview
This is the free notes preview
You're reading the free notes. Aimnova Pro unlocks the full study experience โ and you can try it free for 7 days:
- FlashcardsLock in vocabulary and key terms with spaced repetition.
- Practice questionsAnswer exam-style questions and get instant AI marking.
- Mock exams & past-paper vaultSit full mocks and see exactly how examiners award marks.
- Personalised study planA daily plan built around your exam date and weak areas.
See how examiners mark answers
Access past paper questions with model answers. Learn exactly what earns marks and what doesn't.
โ๏ธ Evaluation: Who Benefits?
Benefits
- Higher output โ the firm serves price-sensitive consumers who wouldn't buy at a single high price โ less deadweight loss.
- Cross-subsidisation โ profits from high-price segments can fund services for low-price segments (e.g. rural postal services).
- Equity argument โ lower prices for students, elderly, or low-income consumers can improve access.
- Firm survival โ enables firms with high fixed costs (airlines, railways) to cover costs and remain viable.
- First degree PD actually achieves allocative efficiency โ output extends to where P = MC.
Drawbacks
- Consumer surplus is reduced โ the firm extracts more of the total surplus.
- Inequity โ the inelastic group (those with fewer alternatives) pays MORE.
- Administrative costs โ segmenting markets and preventing resale is costly.
- Potential for exploitation โ firms with significant market power may use PD to extract excessive rents.
Evaluation depends on context: PD by a pharmaceutical company (life-saving drugs cheaper in developing countries) may be seen as beneficial. PD by a monopolist (higher prices for captive consumers) may be exploitative. Always specify the scenario in your evaluation.