The opinion column: An opinion column (la columna de opinión) is a short, personal piece for a newspaper, magazine or blog in which you defend your own point of view on a topical issue. In Paper 1 you choose it when the task tells you to give and argue your opinion for readers. It's part of Unit 2: Text Types, so the marks come from getting its conventions and register right (Criterion C) — a clear stance and a persuasive voice — not just the topic.
- la columna de opinión
- the opinion column / op-ed
- el titular
- the headline / title
- la tesis
- the stance / main claim you defend
- el argumento
- the argument that supports your view
- la pregunta retórica
- the rhetorical question (asked for effect)
- el tono persuasivo
- a persuasive, opinionated tone
Spot it in the task: The task asks for your opinion. "Escribe una columna de opinión…", "Da tu punto de vista…", "Defiende tu postura sobre…" → an opinion column → first-person and persuasive. If it said "Informa de lo ocurrido" you'd switch to a news report (objective, third person — a different text type). Always read what the task asks you to do first.
Be persuasive and personal: Write in the first person with a confident, persuasive voice: take a clear stance and defend it. Use rhetorical devices — rhetorical questions, emphasis, strong evaluative adjectives — to win the reader over. Consistency matters — a wishy-washy or purely neutral piece reads like a report, breaks the register and costs you Criterion C.
Opinion column — do this
- En mi opinión, no cabe duda de que…
- ¿De verdad creemos que…?
- Es evidente que… / Estoy convencido/a de que…
Neutral report — avoid here
- Según las autoridades, ocurrió ayer.
- Los datos muestran un aumento del 5%.
- No se ofrecieron más detalles.
Stay consistent: Pick a clear stance and a first-person persuasive voice, and keep them from the headline to the conclusion. Your verbs (creo, defiendo), evaluative adjectives and rhetorical questions all have to back that one position.
Know your predicted grade
Take timed mock exams and get detailed feedback on every answer. See exactly where you're losing marks.
Try Mock Exams Free7-day free trial • No card required
The five parts: Every opinion column follows the same shape. Hit all five parts and you've covered the conventions the examiner is looking for.
Opinion column — 5 parts
1
Title
A catchy headline that hints at your view, often a question. «¿Deberían prohibirse los móviles en las aulas?»
2
Opening stance
State your opinion clearly in the first lines. «En mi opinión, el problema no es el móvil…»
3
Main argument
Defend your view with one or two strong reasons — the heart of the column. «Es evidente que… pero también…»
4
Rhetorical question / other side
Engage the reader and acknowledge the counterview to look fair. «¿De verdad creemos que…? Tienen razón en que…, sin embargo…»
5
Opinionated conclusion
Restate your stance forcefully and close with a memorable line. «En conclusión, creo firmemente que…»
Title → Stance → Argument → Question/Counterpoint → Conclusion
Don't skip the frame: Students lose easy Criterion C marks by forgetting the title or by never stating a clear stance. A column without a position is just a report — make your opinion obvious from the first line.
A model, part by part: Here's a complete opinion column built from the five parts above. Read it once for the argument, then tap Ver traducción to check the English or 🔊 to hear it.
Modelo: las 5 partes en acción
La columna escrita, parte por parte
- ¿Deberían prohibirse los móviles en las aulas?
- En mi opinión, el debate está mal planteado: el problema no es el móvil, sino el uso que hacemos de él.
- Es evidente que un teléfono mal gestionado distrae, pero también es una herramienta extraordinaria para aprender, investigar y crear. Prohibirlo sin más sería renunciar a todo su potencial.
- ¿De verdad creemos que la solución pasa por prohibir en vez de educar? Quienes defienden la prohibición tienen razón en una cosa: hace falta orden. Sin embargo, ese orden se enseña, no se impone.
- En conclusión, creo firmemente que la respuesta no es prohibir, sino enseñar a usar bien la tecnología. Eduquemos en el uso responsable y el móvil dejará de ser un enemigo.
Por qué puntúa — why it scores: This short column earns marks on all three Paper 1 criteria — here's how:
A — Language /12
- Persuasive, accurate language; first person throughout
- Contrast connectors: «pero», «sin embargo», «en conclusión»
- Correct verbs (creo, sería, eduquemos)
B — Message /12
- Clear stance, defended with a real argument
- Ideas developed (distraction vs potential, ban vs educate)
C — Conceptual /6
- Column conventions: catchy title + clear thesis
- Persuasive devices: rhetorical question, counterpoint
- Consistent first-person, opinionated voice
Get feedback like a real examiner
Submit your answers and get instant feedback — what you did well, what's missing, and exactly what to write to score full marks.
Try AI Tutor Free7-day free trial • No card required
A toolkit you can reuse: Learn a few ready-made phrases for each part. They make your column sound persuasive and save time in the exam. Tap 🔊 to hear them.
Para dar tu opinión (stating your view)
- En mi opinión, … — In my opinion, …
- No cabe duda de que… — There is no doubt that…
- Estoy convencido/a de que… — I am convinced that…
Para persuadir (rhetorical devices)
- ¿De verdad creemos que…? — Do we really believe that…?
- Es evidente que… — It is obvious that…
- Sin embargo, … / Por el contrario, … — However, … / On the contrary, …
Para concluir (closings)
- En conclusión, creo firmemente que… — In conclusion, I firmly believe that…
- Por todo ello, … — For all these reasons, …
- Ha llegado el momento de… — The time has come to…
Use one from each: One phrase to state your view, one or two persuasive devices in the body, and one strong closer is plenty — and instantly makes the piece feel like a real opinion column.