The big idea: When you call something 'good', what's its opposite — bad, or evil? Nietzsche says that tiny choice hides two completely different moralities.
Two moralities: One grew among the strong, the other among the weak — and they mean almost opposite things by 'good'.
He calls them master morality and slave morality. This micro lays them side by side.
Free preview
This is the free notes preview
You're reading the free notes. Aimnova Pro unlocks the full study experience — and you can try it with your first topic free to keep:
- FlashcardsLock in vocabulary and key terms with spaced repetition.
- Practice questionsAnswer exam-style questions and get instant AI marking.
- Mock exams & past-paper vaultSit full mocks and see exactly how examiners award marks.
- Personalised study planA daily plan built around your exam date and weak areas.
Start with the older code, the one Nietzsche thinks came first.
The strong name themselves 'good': Picture the ancient nobles — confident, powerful, full of life. They look at themselves and say: this is good — strong, brave, generous, proud.
'Good' comes **first**
- The noble says 'I am good'
- Strong, brave, generous, proud
'Bad' is only an afterthought
- Just a shrug at everything unlike them
- The weak, the timid, the low
Master morality: Nietzsche calls this the morality of masters: it flows out of self-affirmation, not resentment.
Checkpoint — master morality: In one line: the strong call themselves 'good' out of pride, and 'bad' is just their mild word for the weak. Hold that — the slaves' morality runs the opposite way round.
Learn what examiners really want
See exactly what to write to score full marks. Our AI shows you model answers and the key phrases examiners look for.
Now flip it. What morality would the weak invent, the ones on the receiving end of all that noble strength?
The weak start with 'evil': The weak can't beat the strong in the world, so they fight back with values.
How slave morality is built
Brand the strong
First they call the powerful evil — cruel, dangerous, arrogant.
Call themselves good
Then, by contrast, they call themselves good — meek, patient, humble, harmless.
Repackage weakness
The very traits that make you weak become virtues: you can't strike back, so you call it 'forgiveness'.
Evil first, good second.
Notice the order has flipped: Here 'evil' comes first (a NO to the strong), and 'good' is defined as simply not being like them.
Go further — higher-level insight: See what makes slave morality so clever, and so worrying to Nietzsche. It's a revaluation: it re-labels traits that are really just powerlessness — meekness, obedience, holding back — as moral achievements.
Really powerlessness
- Being unable to take revenge
- Being timid
Re-labelled as virtue
- 'Forgiveness'
- 'Humility'
The central claim: That the weak won this contest, and their morality became ours, is the book's central claim. Flagging this revaluation is a top-band point.
Checkpoint — slave morality: In one line: the weak brand the strong 'evil' first, then call their own weakness 'good' — a total reversal of master values.