Back to all History topics
Topic 11.2History HL48 flashcards

Practices and impact on outcome

Practice Flashcards

Flip cards to reveal answers
Card 1 of 4811.2.1
11.2.1
Question

What is the 'Military Revolution' thesis?

Click to reveal answer

Track your progress — Sign up free to save your progress and get smart review reminders based on spaced repetition.

All Flashcards in Topic 11.2

Below are all 48 flashcards for this topic. Sign up free to track your progress and get personalized review schedules.

11.2.112 cards

Card 1concept
Question

What is the 'Military Revolution' thesis?

Answer

The idea that between c1500 and 1750 gunpowder weapons transformed the scale, cost and organisation of war, reshaping armies and the state.

Card 2concept
Question

Who first proposed the Military Revolution thesis, and when?

Answer

Michael Roberts, in 1955, focusing on Sweden c1560–1660 — new tactics, drill and bigger armies that reshaped society.

Card 3concept
Question

How did Geoffrey Parker develop the thesis?

Answer

In 1988 he widened it to include the new bastion fortresses and naval power, and argued the change was gradual over a longer period.

Card 4definition
Question

Define 'pike-and-shot'.

Answer

An infantry system where pikemen (long spears) protected musketeers while they reloaded; the two worked as a team through the 1500s and 1600s.

Card 5process
Question

What replaced pike-and-shot by around 1700?

Answer

The faster flintlock musket plus the bayonet, so every soldier was both gunman and spearman — pikemen were no longer needed.

Card 6concept
Question

Why did siege cannon make medieval castles obsolete?

Answer

Heavy cannon could batter tall, thin stone walls until they collapsed, so even mighty castles could fall in days.

Card 7definition
Question

What is the trace italienne?

Answer

A low, thick, angled 'star' fortress with jutting bastions, designed to absorb and deflect cannon fire and let defenders sweep every approach.

Card 8concept
Question

How did the trace italienne change the style of warfare?

Answer

It made fortresses very hard to storm, so wars became long, costly campaigns of sieges rather than quick battles.

Card 9comparison
Question

Compare a medieval castle and a trace italienne fortress.

Answer

Castle: tall, thin walls that cannon shatter. Trace italienne: low, thick, sloped, angled walls that deflect or absorb cannon fire.

Card 10definition
Question

What is a 'standing army'?

Answer

A permanent, professional, paid army kept all year round, even in peacetime, rather than temporary troops raised only for one campaign.

Card 11concept
Question

What is the 'fiscal-military state'?

Answer

A state organised mainly to raise taxes, borrow money and build a bureaucracy to pay for war — the idea that 'war made the state'.

Card 12concept
Question

How did broadside navies extend the Military Revolution to the sea?

Answer

Ships were built around rows of side cannon; firing a broadside shattered enemies, and larger navies mattered for trade, empire and blockade.

11.2.212 cards

Card 13concept
Question

Who was Wallenstein and what did he do?

Answer

A Bohemian military entrepreneur who raised huge mercenary armies (up to ~100,000 men) for Holy Roman Emperor Ferdinand II. He was assassinated in 1634 when he became too powerful.

Card 14definition
Question

What were 'contributions' in the Thirty Years' War?

Answer

Organised cash and supplies demanded from occupied territory to fund an army — the main way armies paid for themselves ('war must feed war').

Card 15definition
Question

What does 'living off the land' mean?

Answer

Feeding and paying an army from whatever region it occupied, through plunder and requisitioning — devastating the local civilian population.

Card 16concept
Question

What were Gustavus Adolphus's key tactical innovations?

Answer

Mobile field artillery, combined-arms tactics, and lighter, more manoeuvrable/shallower formations that could fire faster and move quickly.

Card 17example
Question

What happened at White Mountain (1620)?

Answer

An early Imperial/Catholic victory near Prague that crushed the Bohemian revolt; showed older deep formations still winning early in the war.

Card 18example
Question

What happened at Breitenfeld (1631)?

Answer

Gustavus Adolphus's Swedish army destroyed the Imperial forces, showcasing his mobile artillery and flexible lines — a landmark of the new tactics.

Card 19example
Question

What happened at Lützen (1632)?

Answer

Sweden won the battle, but Gustavus Adolphus was killed, robbing the Protestant side of its greatest commander.

Card 20concept
Question

Why did sieges matter more than battles?

Answer

Fortified towns held the money, food and river crossings. Controlling star-fort fortresses let an army dominate whole provinces and levy contributions.

Card 21example
Question

What was the Sack of Magdeburg (1631)?

Answer

Imperial forces stormed and burned the Protestant city; roughly 20,000–25,000 inhabitants died. It became the war's most notorious atrocity and a symbol of civilian devastation.

Card 22comparison
Question

Plunder vs requisitioning

Answer

Plunder = soldiers directly seizing food, valuables and livestock. Requisitioning = the more organised forcing of local people to hand over supplies, quarters and cash.

Card 23concept
Question

How does the Military Revolution explain the war's destructiveness?

Answer

Gunpowder tactics and ever-larger armies that had to feed themselves, campaigning for three decades, produced unprecedented cost and destruction — some regions lost a third or more of their people.

Card 24concept
Question

Why did rulers use military entrepreneurs instead of state armies?

Answer

Early Modern states lacked the tax systems and banks to fund war on this scale, so renting an army from a private contractor pushed the up-front cost and risk onto the entrepreneur.

11.2.312 cards

Card 25concept
Question

What were the two gunpowder empires in the Ottoman–Safavid Wars?

Answer

The Sunni Ottoman Empire (based in Istanbul) and the Shia Safavid Empire (based in Persia/Iran).

Card 26definition
Question

Define a 'gunpowder empire'.

Answer

A state whose military power rested on cannon and firearms rather than only on cavalry.

Card 27definition
Question

Who were the Janissaries?

Answer

The Ottoman sultan's elite, paid standing infantry, armed with muskets and famous for their discipline.

Card 28definition
Question

Who were the Qizilbash?

Answer

The Safavids' tribal cavalry, known for their red headgear, who fought with bow, lance and sword.

Card 29concept
Question

What made the Ottoman army so powerful?

Answer

Disciplined Janissary infantry armed with firearms, backed by a powerful artillery train of heavy cannon.

Card 30example
Question

What happened at the Battle of Chaldiran (1514)?

Answer

Ottoman cannon and muskets defeated the Safavid Qizilbash cavalry charge — firepower beating the cavalry charge.

Card 31concept
Question

Why were the Safavids slow to adopt firearms?

Answer

Their army was built on tribal Qizilbash cavalry, and many horsemen saw guns as dishonourable.

Card 32process
Question

How did Shah Abbas I (1588–1629) reform the Safavid army?

Answer

He built a paid, gunpowder-equipped standing army with muskets and artillery, loyal to the shah not the tribes.

Card 33example
Question

Which two cities were repeatedly besieged on the frontier?

Answer

Baghdad (in Mesopotamia) and Tabriz (near the Caucasus) changed hands many times.

Card 34concept
Question

What kind of warfare dominated these wars?

Answer

Frontier siege warfare — the long struggle to capture and hold fortified cities rather than open battle.

Card 35concept
Question

How did terrain and logistics shape the wars?

Answer

Long campaigns crossed harsh mountains and deserts; supply was hard, and scorched-earth tactics could starve an invading army.

Card 36comparison
Question

Compare Ottoman and Safavid armies.

Answer

Both used gunpowder and artillery, but the Ottomans leaned on firearms infantry while the Safavids relied on cavalry until reformed by Shah Abbas I.

11.2.412 cards

Card 37definition
Question

What was the macuahuitl?

Answer

An Aztec close-combat weapon: a wooden club edged with sharp but brittle obsidian blades.

Card 38concept
Question

Why was obsidian a weaker material than steel in combat?

Answer

Obsidian cut well but was brittle and shattered on impact with metal, while steel held its edge through repeated blows.

Card 39concept
Question

Why were horses such a shock weapon in the conquest?

Answer

There were no horses in the Americas before the Spanish arrived, so Aztec and Inca warriors had never faced a mounted charge and had no tactics to counter one.

Card 40example
Question

When did smallpox reach Mexico, and what was one major effect?

Answer

In 1520; it killed huge numbers of Aztecs, including Emperor Cuitláhuac, within about 80 days of him taking the throne.

Card 41process
Question

How did smallpox affect the Inca Empire before Pizarro's arrival?

Answer

It killed Emperor Huayna Capac around 1527, leaving no clear heir and triggering a civil war between his sons Atahualpa and Huáscar.

Card 42concept
Question

Who were the Tlaxcalans and why did they ally with Cortés?

Answer

A powerful indigenous people who resisted Aztec domination; after early fighting with Cortés, they allied with the Spanish against their old enemy, the Aztecs.

Card 43example
Question

What role did Tlaxcalan warriors play in the fall of Tenochtitlan?

Answer

They supplied the large numbers of warriors needed to besiege the city — without this alliance, the small Spanish force likely could not have taken it.

Card 44definition
Question

Who was Malinche and why did she matter to Cortés?

Answer

An enslaved woman fluent in Nahuatl and Maya who worked as Cortés's interpreter and adviser, helping him negotiate alliances such as the one with Tlaxcala.

Card 45example
Question

What happened at Cajamarca in 1532?

Answer

Pizarro invited Inca emperor Atahualpa to a meeting, then ambushed his lightly-armed escort, killed thousands, and captured Atahualpa.

Card 46concept
Question

Why was capturing the ruler such an effective tactic against these empires?

Answer

Both empires were highly centralised, so seizing or killing the ruler (as with Atahualpa, executed 1533) could paralyse the whole state's ability to organise resistance.

Card 47comparison
Question

Compare the fall of the Aztec Empire and the fall of the Inca Empire.

Answer

Aztec: Cortés (1519) used Tlaxcalan alliances and a siege of Tenochtitlan (1521), with smallpox killing Cuitláhuac. Inca: Pizarro (1532) exploited a smallpox-triggered civil war and captured Atahualpa at Cajamarca (executed 1533).

Card 48concept
Question

What three practices best explain the outcome of the Spanish conquest?

Answer

Superior technology (steel, horses, gunpowder), the devastating impact of Old World disease (smallpox), and alliances with indigenous peoples like the Tlaxcalans, combined with decisive leadership.

Want smart review reminders?

Sign up free to track your progress. Our spaced repetition algorithm will tell you exactly which cards to review and when.

Start Free