The big idea: Across the world, total energy and resource consumption is rising — driven by a growing population and a growing middle class.
But the picture differs by income group:
- In many high-income countries (HICs), per-person energy use is now falling (efficiency, services, cleaner fuels). - In middle-income countries (MICs), per-person use is rising fast as people get richer.
| Country | 2000 | 2020 | Income group |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 3.1 | 2.5 | High income |
| Japan | 2.0 | 1.4 | High income |
| Germany | 1.6 | 1.3 | High income |
| China | 0.3 | 0.9 | Middle income |
| India | 0.1 | 0.3 | Middle income |
| Nigeria | 0.1 | 0.1 | Low income |
Key terms
- Energy consumption — how much energy a country (or person) uses, often in tonnes of oil equivalent.
- Per-person (per capita) — the amount divided by the population; falls even when the total rises if population grows faster.
- E-waste — discarded electrical and electronic equipment (phones, TVs, computers).
- Energy security — reliable, affordable access to enough energy; weakened by heavy reliance on imported fuel.
How this is tested: Paper 2 Q3/Q4 in this topic almost always opens on a map or infographic of energy/resource use. You State a range, Identify a value, Estimate off a scale, or Describe a trend with figures.
Whatever the command: quote numbers and units straight from the figure.
| Country | E-waste per person (kg) | Income per person (US$ thousands) |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 26 | 75 |
| Australia | 21 | 55 |
| United Kingdom | 23 | 45 |
| China | 7 | 12 |
| India | 3 | 2 |
| Kenya | 1 | 2 |
IB-style question - read the figure
Using the table: (a) state the range of e-waste generated per person [1]; (b) identify the country with the most e-waste per person [1]; (c) describe the relationship between income per person and e-waste per person [2].
How to answer each part
- (a) State the range. Range = highest minus lowest = 26 - 1 = 25 kg per person (from 1 to 26).
- (b) Identify the highest. Scan the e-waste column - Norway is highest at 26 kg per person.
- (c) Describe the relationship. It is positive: richer countries (Norway US$75k -> 26 kg) generate more e-waste per person than poorer ones (Kenya US$2k -> 1 kg).
Final answer
(a) 25 kg per person (1 to 26); (b) Norway; (c) a positive relationship - higher income goes with more e-waste per person.
Practice with real exam questions
Answer exam-style questions and get AI feedback that shows you exactly what examiners want to see in a full-marks response.
Why it FALLS in many high-income countries
- Energy efficiency - better cars, insulation and appliances do the same job with less fuel.
- Shift to services - factories move abroad, so the economy uses less heavy energy at home.
- Cleaner electricity - switching from oil to gas, nuclear and renewables cuts oil use per person.
Why it RISES in many middle-income countries
- Rising incomes - a growing middle class buys cars, fridges, air-conditioning and flights.
- Industrialisation - new factories and construction are energy-hungry.
- Urbanisation - cities and infrastructure demand far more energy than rural life.
Development changes the energy a country can access: Economic development does not just raise demand - it also raises the energy available to a country: more money to build power stations, import fuel, exploit reserves and buy efficient technology.
It also reshapes which sources matter: nuclear, for example, is growing in some fast-developing nations but declining in others worried about cost and safety.
The graphing-skills part: Q4 often asks you to suggest a better graph for a dataset and give a reason, or to improve a chart.
- Proportions of a whole (e.g. fuel mix) -> a pie chart or stacked bar. - Change over time -> a line graph. - Comparing categories -> a bar chart.
Always add why it suits the data (shows the part-to-whole / trend / comparison clearly).
IB-style question - improve the graph
A country's electricity comes from coal 40%, gas 25%, nuclear 20%, renewables 15%. Suggest one graphical method to display this and give a reason. [2]
How to answer
- Choose the method. The data are parts of one whole (a fuel mix adding to 100%), so a pie chart suits it.
- Give the reason. A pie chart shows each fuel as a proportion of the total, making the share of each source easy to compare at a glance.
Final answer
1 mark for a valid method (pie chart / stacked bar) + 1 for a reason tied to showing proportions of a whole.