International climate agreements
Big idea: Climate change is a global problem requiring international cooperation. Key agreements include the UNFCCC, Kyoto Protocol, and Paris Agreement.
Key agreements timeline
- 1992 — UNFCCC: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Established the goal of stabilising GHG concentrations. Nearly universal membership.
- 1997 — Kyoto Protocol: Set binding emission reduction targets for developed countries. Clean Development Mechanism allowed carbon trading. US never ratified.
- 2015 — Paris Agreement: Goal to limit warming to 1.5–2°C above pre-industrial. Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) from all countries. Regular review cycles.
The Paris Agreement in detail
- Goal: Limit warming to well below 2°C, preferably 1.5°C
- NDCs: Each country sets its own targets (nationally determined contributions)
- Ratchet mechanism: Targets must be strengthened every 5 years
- Climate finance: Developed countries help fund action in developing countries
- Transparency: Countries report progress and undergo review
The Paris Agreement is bottom-up (countries set own targets) unlike Kyoto which was top-down (targets imposed on countries). This got more countries to participate but targets may be insufficient.
Exam tip: Be ready to evaluate these agreements — what worked, what didnt, and why international cooperation on climate is so challenging.
Free preview
This is the free notes preview
You're reading the free notes. Aimnova Pro unlocks the full study experience — and you can try it free for 7 days:
- FlashcardsLock in vocabulary and key terms with spaced repetition.
- Practice questionsAnswer exam-style questions and get instant AI marking.
- Mock exams & past-paper vaultSit full mocks and see exactly how examiners award marks.
- Personalised study planA daily plan built around your exam date and weak areas.
Environmental value systems and climate
Big idea: Different environmental value systems (EVSs) lead to different approaches to climate change — from technocentric optimism to ecocentric lifestyle change.
EVS approaches to climate change
Technocentric approaches
- Technology will solve the problem
- Focus on CCS, nuclear, geoengineering
- Economic growth can continue
- Market solutions (carbon trading)
- Human ingenuity will adapt
Ecocentric approaches
- Need fundamental lifestyle change
- Focus on reduced consumption
- Question economic growth model
- Local, community solutions
- Live within planetary boundaries
How EVSs influence responses
- Cornucopian: Climate change is manageable; technology will fix it; may even be beneficial
- Environmental manager: Accept science; support moderate regulation and market solutions
- Soft ecologist: Need systemic change; promote renewable energy, sustainable lifestyles
- Deep ecologist: Radical reduction in consumption; prioritise nature over economic growth
Exam tip: EVS questions are common in essays. Show you understand that different worldviews lead to different preferred solutions, and evaluate both perspectives.
Feeling unprepared for exams?
Get a clear study plan, practice with real questions, and know exactly where you stand before exam day. No more guessing.
IB-style question — purpose of a global climate treaty [2]
Many countries have signed an international agreement that sets a shared target to limit global temperature rise.
Outline two reasons why international agreements are needed to tackle climate change. [2]
How to answer it, step by step
- The problem crosses borders
• Greenhouse gases mix in one shared atmosphere, so one country's emissions affect everyone
• No single country can solve it alone - Agreements share the effort
• They set common targets so countries cut emissions together
• This stops some nations 'free-riding' while others act
Final answer
Stress that climate change is a GLOBAL commons problem — shared atmosphere, shared responsibility — so cooperation is needed, not solo action.
IB-style question — do EVSs shape climate action? [7]
An ecocentric and a technocentric observer disagree about how the world should respond to climate change.
Discuss how environmental value systems (EVSs) influence whether countries favour mitigation, adaptation or international agreements. [7]
How to answer it, step by step
- Show how each EVS leans
• Ecocentric: prefers strong mitigation — cut emissions, change lifestyles, protect nature
• Technocentric: trusts technology and adaptation — sea walls, carbon capture, geo-engineering; anthropocentric backs binding treaties and economic tools - Weigh it up and conclude
• Explain that international agreements must blend EVSs, which slows talks (e.g. development vs emission cuts)
• e.g. 'A mix of EVSs explains why global deals are hard to agree but, once shared, drive the strongest action.'
Final answer
For a [7] 'discuss' you must name 2–3 EVSs, link each to a preferred response (mitigation/adaptation/agreement), AND finish with a reasoned conclusion — not just definitions.