The big idea: At HL we put a number on the link between temperature and rate. The Arrhenius equation says how the rate constant k depends on temperature:
k = A·e^{−E_{a}/RT}
The rate constant grows when the temperature T rises, when the activation energy E_{a} is low, and when the Arrhenius factor A (collision frequency and orientation) is large.
- the rate constant
- the Arrhenius (frequency) factor — collision frequency × correct orientation (steric factor)
- the activation energy (J mol⁻¹)
- the gas constant = 8.31 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹
- the absolute temperature (K)
Define your terms: - A — the Arrhenius (frequency) factor. It accounts for how often molecules collide and whether they collide with the right orientation (the steric factor). It has the same units as k. - E_{a} — the activation energy. The minimum energy a collision must have to react. It sits in the exponent, so it has a huge effect on k. - R — the gas constant, 8.31 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹. - T — the absolute temperature in kelvin (always convert °C → K by adding 273).
Why k rises so STEEPLY with temperature: Ea is negative in the exponent and T is in the denominator. So a small rise in T makes the exponent less negative, and because it is an exponential, k can change a lot — a 10 K rise near room temperature often roughly doubles the rate constant.
This is the maths behind the Maxwell–Boltzmann picture: a higher T puts a much larger fraction of molecules above Ea.
Why k climbs so steeply with T: raising the temperature shifts the energy distribution right, so a much larger fraction of molecules has energy ≥ Eₐ. That growing fraction is exactly what the e−Eₐ/RT term in the Arrhenius equation captures.
Interactive diagram
Explore the labelled diagram, charts and maps for this topic in full study mode.
Reading the Arrhenius equation tells you, at a glance, what makes k bigger or smaller:
| Change | Effect on the exponent −Eₐ/RT | Effect on k |
|---|---|---|
| raise T | the exponent becomes less negative (T is in the denominator) | k increases — steeply (often roughly doubles per 10 K) |
| lower Eₐ (e.g. a catalyst) | the exponent becomes less negative | k increases |
| raise Eₐ | the exponent becomes more negative | k decreases |
| larger A (more frequent, better-oriented collisions) | no change to the exponent | k increases (k ∝ A) |
Take logs to get a straight line: The exponential form is awkward to handle. Taking the natural log of both sides turns it into the equation of a straight line:
- plotted on the y-axis
- plotted on the x-axis (T in K)
- the gradient of the straight line
- the y-intercept (where 1/T = 0)
Match it to y = mx + c: Compare ln k = ln A − (E_{a}/R)(1/T) with y = mx + c:
- y = ln k (vertical axis) - x = 1/T (horizontal axis) - gradient m = −E_{a}/R (always negative, because Ea > 0) - intercept c = ln A (the value of ln k when 1/T = 0)
So plotting ln k against 1/T gives a straight line whose slope gives Ea and whose intercept gives A.
Learn what examiners really want
See exactly what to write to score full marks. Our AI shows you model answers and the key phrases examiners look for.
The rate constant of a reaction was measured at five temperatures. The values of ln k and 1/T are tabulated below ready to plot an Arrhenius plot (ln k on the y-axis, 1/T on the x-axis):
An Arrhenius plot: ln k against 1/T gives a straight line with gradient = −Eₐ/R and y-intercept = ln A. The steeper the (negative) gradient, the larger the activation energy.
Interactive diagram
Explore the labelled diagram, charts and maps for this topic in full study mode.
| T / K | 1/T / 10⁻³ K⁻¹ | k / s⁻¹ | ln k |
|---|---|---|---|
| 333 | 3.00 | 9.7 × 10⁻² | −2.33 |
| 323 | 3.10 | 5.9 × 10⁻² | −2.83 |
| 313 | 3.19 | 3.5 × 10⁻² | −3.35 |
| 303 | 3.30 | 2.0 × 10⁻² | −3.91 |
| 294 | 3.40 | 1.3 × 10⁻² | −4.34 |
Reading the gradient: The points lie on a straight line. Take two well-separated points on the line (the first and last rows) to find the gradient — gradient = Δ(ln k) ÷ Δ(1/T). Remember 1/T values are in 10⁻³ K⁻¹, so 3.00 means 3.00 × 10⁻³ K⁻¹.
Worked example — activation energy from the gradient
Use the first and last data points to find the gradient of the ln k vs 1/T line, then calculate the activation energy Eₐ in kJ mol⁻¹. (R = 8.31 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹.)
Solution
- Formula first — the linear Arrhenius form tells us the gradient:
- Find the gradient from the two end points (1/T in K⁻¹, so 3.00 × 10⁻³ and 3.40 × 10⁻³):
- Work out top and bottom:
- Rearrange the relationship for Ea:
- Substitute (the two minus signs cancel):
- Convert J → kJ by dividing by 1000:
Final answer
gradient = −5.0 × 10³ K; Eₐ = −gradient × R = 41.6 kJ mol⁻¹.
Worked example — the Arrhenius factor A from the intercept
The y-intercept of the same ln k vs 1/T line (where 1/T = 0) is ln A = 12.7. Calculate the Arrhenius factor A.
Solution
- Formula first — the intercept of the linear form is ln A:
- Undo the natural log by raising e to that power:
- Work it out (same units as k, here s⁻¹):
Final answer
A = e¹²·⁷ = 3.3 × 10⁵ s⁻¹ (A has the same units as k).
You don't always have a full graph. If you know the rate constant at two temperatures, the two-point form of the Arrhenius equation gives Ea directly:
- rate constants at temperatures T₁ and T₂
- the two absolute temperatures (K)
- the activation energy (J mol⁻¹ — ÷ 1000 for kJ mol⁻¹)
- the gas constant = 8.31 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹
Worked example — Eₐ from two rate constants
For a reaction, k = 1.0 × 10⁻³ s⁻¹ at 300 K (T₁) and k = 4.0 × 10⁻³ s⁻¹ at 320 K (T₂). Calculate the activation energy Eₐ in kJ mol⁻¹. (R = 8.31 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹.)
Solution
- Formula first — the two-point Arrhenius form:
- Left side — the ratio of rate constants:
- The temperature bracket (T₂ = 320 K, T₁ = 300 K):
- Rearrange for Ea:
- Substitute (the two minus signs make Ea positive):
- Work it out, then convert J → kJ:
Final answer
Eₐ = 55.3 kJ mol⁻¹.
How this is tested: This is a classic HL Paper 2 skill.
- Graph version: you are given (or must plot) ln k against 1/T, read the gradient, then use E_{a} = −gradient × R and convert to kJ mol⁻¹. - Two-point version: you are given k at two temperatures and use the two-point form.
Both routes give the same Ea; examiners may also ask you to explain the shape of the graph (straight line, negative gradient) and to identify the intercept as ln A.
The traps that cost marks: (1) Always work in kelvin (add 273 to °C). (2) The gradient is −E_{a}/R, so Ea = −gradient × R — never drop the minus sign. (3) R is in J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹, so your raw Ea is in J mol⁻¹ — ÷ 1000 for kJ mol⁻¹.