Linearizing relationships & testing a law

The big idea: A straight line is easy to read — its gradient is a single number.

So when a law is curved (like P getting bigger as V gets smaller), we re-plot it as a straight line: pick what to put on each axis so the graph comes out straight. This is linearizing.

Once it is straight you can do two things: read a physics quantity off the gradient, and test whether the data really obey the law.

What 'directly proportional' looks like: Two quantities are directly proportional when their graph is a straight line that passes through the origin (0, 0).

So to test a 'proportional' claim, you check both: is the line straight, and does it go through the origin?

Here is a curved law made straight. The gas law PV = constant is a curve if you plot P against V — but if you instead plot P against 1/V (one over the volume), the points fall on a straight line through the origin:

Read it like y = mx + c: Compare your plotted variables to the line equation Y = mX + c:

- the thing on the up axis is Y - the thing on the across axis is X - the gradient m and intercept c are then physics quantities.

Method: rearrange the law into the form Y = mX + c. Whatever multiplies the variable becomes the gradient. For example, the gas law PV = k rearranges to P = k × (1/V) — so plotting P (up) against 1/V (across) gives a straight line whose gradient is k.

The gradient is a physics quantity: After linearizing, the gradient is never 'just a number' — it equals a constant in the law (a spring constant, a refractive index, a gas constant…). Always say what the gradient represents and give its units.

How this is tested: Paper 1B almost always builds a whole question around one experiment, and linearizing is the part that ties it together.

- What they ask: state what to plot to get a straight line · find a missing point's coordinates so you can plot it · explain how the graph decides whether a proposed law holds · show (with two data rows) that two quantities are not directly proportional. - The classic trap: assuming any straight-ish line means 'proportional'. It only counts as proportional if the line also passes through the origin.

An experiment measures how the depth d that a marker sinks depends on the water pressure P pushing on it. Theory predicts d = k√P, so the student plans to plot depth against root-pressure (√P). The graph below is straight and passes through the origin, supporting the law: