An enlightened despot used the ideas of the philosophes — reason, tolerance, legal reform — while keeping all real power in royal hands. The IB prescribes a case study of any two enlightened despots, examining their policies, the impact of those policies, and the extent to which they produced genuine change. The two rulers most closely examined in European history are Frederick II (the Great) of Prussia (reigned 1740–1786) and Catherine II (the Great) of Russia (reigned 1762–1796).
Note: Louis XIV and Joseph II are not prescribed and will not be named in exam questions for this section.
Frederick the Great of Prussia (reigned 1740–1786)
Legal and judicial reform
Frederick abolished torture as a tool of interrogation (1740) and ordered a rationalisation of Prussian law under the jurist Samuel von Cocceji. He declared that 'a monarch is the first servant of the state' — signalling that power carried responsibility. He also ended serfdom on royal estates, though noble estates were left untouched, limiting real impact.
Religious toleration
Frederick extended broad toleration to Catholics, Jews and other minorities within Prussia. His famous statement — 'all religions must be tolerated' — reflected Enlightenment values. In practice, toleration improved the economic usefulness of Prussia by attracting skilled immigrants and merchants, but it did not translate into political equality.
Economic and military policy
Frederick pursued mercantilism, subsidising Prussian industries (silk, porcelain, textiles) and draining marshland to open new farmland for settlers. His military campaigns — the War of Austrian Succession and the Seven Years' War — expanded Prussia and made it a great European power, but at enormous human cost.
Extent of change — limits
Frederick's reforms were selective and pragmatic. Serfdom was not abolished on private estates; the Junker nobility retained enormous privilege; the press was censored when it threatened the state. He corresponded with Voltaire as an intellectual equal, yet he described himself as 'enlightened' only insofar as it served the power of the Prussian state. Real social liberation was minimal.
Catherine the Great of Russia (reigned 1762–1796)
- Nakaz (1767) — Catherine wrote an 'Instruction' drawing directly on Montesquieu and Beccaria; it called for a humane legal code, religious toleration and limits on torture. The Legislative Commission it convened debated but never enacted its proposals.
- Education and culture — Catherine founded the Smolny Institute (1764) for the education of noble women, established schools across Russia, and imported Western artists, architects and scholars to St Petersburg, making it a centre of Enlightenment culture.
- Religious toleration — She extended toleration to Muslims, Buddhists and Catholics within the empire, reflecting Enlightenment ideals of rational governance.
- Pugachev Rebellion (1773–1775) — A massive serf uprising led by Emelyan Pugachev alarmed Catherine and ended her reforming impulse. After suppression she actually strengthened the power of the nobility over serfs, moving Russia away from Enlightenment goals.
- Foreign policy — Catherine expanded Russia westward (Partition of Poland, 1772, 1793, 1795) and southward against the Ottomans, gaining the Crimea. This was classical power politics, not Enlightenment philosophy.
- Extent of change — Like Frederick, Catherine's 'enlightenment' was largely rhetorical. Serfdom intensified under her reign. She corresponded with Voltaire and Diderot but accepted no limits on autocratic power.
Frederick the Great — reforms that stuck
- Torture abolished in Prussian courts (1740)
- Legal rationalisation under Cocceji
- Religious toleration extended across Prussia
- Mercantilist industrial subsidies boosted Prussian economy
- Agricultural colonisation of drained marshland
Catherine the Great — reforms that stuck
- Smolny Institute — first school for women in Russia
- Provincial government reorganised (1775 Statute)
- Cultural patronage — Hermitage collection founded
- Toleration extended to non-Orthodox faiths
- Russia integrated into European intellectual culture
Paper-3 question focus: extent of change: Examiners love asking how 'enlightened' the enlightened despots really were. The key argument: reforms served the state and the ruler's power first; genuine social liberation (ending serfdom, granting political rights) was largely refused. Use the Pugachev Rebellion to show that Catherine moved backwards after 1775. Use Frederick's Junker-friendly limits to show that Prussian reform was selective.
Free preview
This is the free notes preview
You're reading the free notes. Aimnova Pro unlocks the full study experience — and you can try it free for 7 days:
- FlashcardsLock in vocabulary and key terms with spaced repetition.
- Practice questionsAnswer exam-style questions and get instant AI marking.
- Mock exams & past-paper vaultSit full mocks and see exactly how examiners award marks.
- Personalised study planA daily plan built around your exam date and weak areas.
The Enlightenment era (roughly 1650–1800) was not just a revolution of ideas — it coincided with profound changes in how Europeans lived and worked. Two developments shaped everyday life across the continent: the growth of cities and the transformation of agriculture. These changes both reflected and reinforced Enlightenment thinking about reason, improvement and progress.
Growth of Cities
Why cities grew
Agricultural enclosure and improvement pushed people off the land and into towns in search of work. Trade expansion — especially Atlantic commerce — made ports and commercial centres richer. London grew from roughly 490,000 in 1650 to about 900,000 by 1800, making it Europe's largest city. Paris grew from around 400,000 to over 650,000 in the same period.
What urbanisation meant
Cities became centres of print culture, coffeehouses, salons and public debate — the environment in which Enlightenment ideas spread fastest. A literate urban middle class (the bourgeoisie) grew in size and confidence, consuming pamphlets, encyclopaedias and newspapers. Urban workers, however, often lived in poverty and squalor.
Social tension
Urban growth created instability. Food prices were volatile. Guilds resisted new industries. Popular riots over bread prices were common across France, England and the Dutch Republic. This tension would eventually feed directly into the French Revolution (1789).
Push (agriculture) → Pull (trade) → Print (Enlightenment) → Protest (tension)
Agricultural Change
- Enclosure movement (especially England) — Common land was fenced off into private farms, displacing peasant communities but dramatically raising crop yields and profitability.
- New crops and rotations — The four-field crop rotation system (popularised by figures like Jethro Tull and Charles Townshend) replaced the old three-field fallow cycle, raising output without exhausting soil.
- Selective breeding — Robert Bakewell and others applied rationalist thinking to livestock, breeding heavier cattle and sheep, echoing Enlightenment belief in improvement through science.
- Impact on population — Better food production contributed to population growth across Europe: England's population roughly doubled between 1700 and 1800. This in turn fed urban growth.
- Regional variation — Change was faster in England and the Dutch Republic than in France, Spain or Russia, where noble privilege and serfdom blocked agricultural modernisation.
The link between agriculture and Enlightenment: Enlightenment thinkers saw agricultural improvement as proof that reason could master nature and increase human welfare. The Physiocrats in France argued that agricultural reform was the key to national prosperity — influencing later economic policy. The 'improving landlord' became a celebrated figure in 18th-century culture.
Who benefited and who did not: Agricultural improvement increased overall food production but often hurt the rural poor. Enclosure eliminated common rights (grazing, wood-gathering) that ordinary families depended on. In France and Russia, peasants remained trapped in feudal or serf-like obligations. Enlightenment rhetoric about 'improvement' and 'progress' largely served the interests of the propertied classes.
Feeling unprepared for exams?
Get a clear study plan, practice with real questions, and know exactly where you stand before exam day. No more guessing.
Throughout the period 1650–1800, European monarchs used art, architecture and music as instruments of political power. The relationship between monarchy and culture was not decorative — it was deliberate. The dominant artistic style of the age was the Baroque, and its grandeur was inseparable from the ambitions of absolutist states.
What Was the Baroque?
Baroque: power made visible: The Baroque movement emerged partly from the Counter-Reformation Catholic Church and was rapidly adopted by absolutist monarchies. Its hallmarks were grandeur, emotional intensity, dramatic light and shadow (chiaroscuro), sweeping architecture and elaborate ornamentation. All of this communicated one message: the ruler is magnificent and ordained by God.
| Domain | Key examples | Political purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Palace of Versailles (France) — the template for European palace building; its Hall of Mirrors, formal gardens and sheer scale were designed to awe visitors and centralise the French nobility at court | Demonstrate royal power; subordinate the aristocracy spatially |
| Painting | Peter Paul Rubens — court painter across Europe; his canvases glorified monarchs, church and mythological power in vivid, dynamic compositions | Legitimise rulers through divine and heroic association |
| Sculpture | Gian Lorenzo Bernini — papal and royal commissions; his figures seem to move and breathe, communicating divine drama | Counter-Reformation propaganda; glorify Catholic monarchy |
| Music | Composers such as George Frideric Handel and Johann Sebastian Bach worked under royal or aristocratic patronage; Handel's 'Water Music' was composed for George I of Britain | Ceremonial glorification; entertainment as political display |
| Opera and theatre | The court opera became a symbol of royal prestige across Italy, France and the Holy Roman Empire; building an opera house signalled civilised, powerful monarchy | Compete with rival courts; assert cultural supremacy |
It is important to note that Mozart's music is not prescribed for this section (per the syllabus amendment). The Baroque sits roughly 1600–1750; by Mozart's era (1756–1791) the dominant style was the Classical, and Enlightenment culture was beginning to question the grandiose absolutist aesthetic in favour of simpler, more 'rational' forms.
Patronage as Political Control
- Patronage system — monarchs and nobles paid artists, architects and composers in return for works that glorified them. This gave rulers direct control over the cultural messages reaching educated audiences across Europe.
- Centralisation of artists — By drawing the best artists to their courts, rulers concentrated cultural prestige. Versailles made Paris the cultural capital of Europe; St Petersburg under Catherine the Great was designed to rival it.
- Academies and institutions — The Académie Française (1635), the Académie des Beaux-Arts (1648) and similar bodies in other states brought art under royal regulation, standardising taste and suppressing dissent.
- The Enlightenment challenge — By the mid-18th century, philosophes increasingly criticised Baroque excess as irrational and self-serving. Neoclassicism — simpler, drawing on Greek and Roman models — began to replace Baroque as the preferred style of 'rational' rulers and educated elites.
- Frederick the Great's court at Sans-Souci — Frederick's palace near Potsdam was deliberately lighter and more intimate than Versailles — a statement that an enlightened ruler preferred reason to spectacle, though his patronage of the arts (especially music and architecture) was extensive.
Versailles as the model of absolutist cultural power: The Palace of Versailles (built from 1661, greatly expanded through the 1680s) housed the French court of roughly 10,000 nobles and servants under one roof. By requiring the nobility to attend court, the monarch kept them under observation, removed them from their provincial power bases, and turned competition for royal favour into the central activity of aristocratic life. Art, gardens, fountains and ceremony were all instruments of control — the most spectacular example of Baroque cultural power in Europe.