aimnova.
DashboardMy LearningPaper MasteryStudy Plan

Stay in the loop

Study tips, product updates, and early access to new features.

aimnova.

AI-powered IB study platform with personalised plans, instant feedback, and examiner-style marking.

IB Subjects
  • All IB Subjects
  • IB Diploma
  • IB ESS
  • IB Economics
  • IB Business Management
  • IB Math AI
  • IB Math AA
  • IB Physics
  • IB Biology
  • IB Chemistry
  • IB History
  • IB Geography
  • IB Spanish B
  • IB German B
  • IB Italian B
  • IB French B
  • IB English B
Question Banks
  • ESS Question Bank
  • Economics Question Bank
  • Business Management Question Bank
  • Math AI Question Bank
  • Math AA Question Bank
  • Physics Question Bank
  • Biology Question Bank
  • Chemistry Question Bank
  • History Question Bank
  • Geography Question Bank
  • Spanish B Question Bank
  • German B Question Bank
  • Italian B Question Bank
  • French B Question Bank
  • English B Question Bank
Predicted Topics 2026
  • ESS Predictions 2026
  • Economics Predictions 2026
  • Business Management Predictions 2026
  • Math AI Predictions 2026
  • Math AA Predictions 2026
  • Physics Predictions 2026
  • Biology Predictions 2026
  • Chemistry Predictions 2026
  • History Predictions 2026
  • Geography Predictions 2026
  • Spanish B Predictions 2026
  • German B Predictions 2026
  • Italian B Predictions 2026
  • French B Predictions 2026
  • English B Predictions 2026

Study Resources

  • Free Study Notes
  • Mock Exams
  • Revision Guide
  • Flashcards
  • Exam Skills
  • Command Terms
  • Past Paper Feedback
  • Grade Calculator
  • Exam Timetable 2026

Company

  • Features
  • Pricing
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Cookies

© 2026 Aimnova. All rights reserved.

Made with 💜 for IB students worldwide

v0.1.1487
IB Global Politics Standard Level

Global Politics SL Exam Skills & Techniques

Master the IB Global Politics Standard Level exam. Paper structures, command terms, source and essay technique, essay markbands, and the engagement project — everything you need to score top marks.

150 teaching hours • Paper 1 (source analysis) + Paper 2 (thematic essays) • 1 engagement project

Start Studying Global Politics SL

Global Politics SL Assessment at a Glance

30%
Paper 1
Source analysis • 1h 15m
40%
Paper 2
Thematic essays • 1h 45m
30%
Engagement Project
Internal assessment • ≤2,000 words

Global Politics SL Paper Structure

Know exactly what to expect in each paper and how to maximise your marks.

Paper 1

The core — source analysis
1 hour 15 minutes•30% of the grade•Paper 1 = 30% of final grade

What to expect:

Four sources (A–D) on a core global-political issue (power, sovereignty, legitimacy, interdependence)
Q1: identify points from a source (3 marks)
Q2: explain a claim using a source (4 marks)
Q3: compare and contrast two sources (6 marks)
Q4: evaluate a claim using the sources AND your own knowledge (12 marks)

Key Tips

  • On Q3, write a running comparison of both sources — similarity AND difference.
  • On Q4, group the sources into arguments and add precise own knowledge; reach a judgement.
  • Frame answers around the four key concepts to lift your analysis.

Easy Marks

  • The identify question — lift clear points straight from the source
  • A single clear similarity AND difference on the compare-and-contrast question
  • Explaining a claim by using a source as evidence

Watch Out

  • Summarising the two sources separately instead of comparing them
  • Treating Q4 as a source summary with no own knowledge or judgement
  • Paraphrasing a source on Q2 instead of using it to explain a point

Paper 2

Thematic studies — evaluative essays
1 hour 45 minutes•40% of the grade•Paper 2 = 40% of final grade

What to expect:

TWO essays: Section A (a single thematic study) + Section B (integrating across themes)
Themes: human rights & justice, development & sustainability, peace & conflict
Each essay is marked out of 15 on markbands (focus, perspectives, evidence, judgement)
Rewards diverse perspectives explored AND evaluated, with contemporary examples

Key Tips

  • Budget time for each essay and leave time to plan both.
  • Answer the command term — explore perspectives, weigh them, then judge.
  • Support every point with a precise, recent example.

Easy Marks

  • A focused introduction that sets out your line of argument
  • Well-chosen, contemporary case studies that clearly address the question
  • A conclusion that reaches an explicit, justified judgement

Watch Out

  • Describing viewpoints instead of evaluating them
  • Vague, dateless evidence with no named example
  • Running short on the second essay — pace yourself across both

Global Politics SL Command Terms

Command terms tell you exactly what the examiner expects. Filter by Assessment Objective (AO).

Identify / State3 marks

Give a specific point, message, or example from a source with no supporting explanation — used for the Paper 1 first question ("Identify, according to Source A, …").

Explain / Analyse (using a source)4 marks

Give a reasoned account of a claim using a source and your own understanding — the Paper 1 second question, linking evidence to a clear "because".

Compare and contrast6 marks

Give an account of similarities AND differences between two sources, referring to both throughout in a running comparison — the Paper 1 third-question skill.

Evaluate (sources + own knowledge)12 marks

Weigh a claim using ALL the sources and your own knowledge to reach a supported judgement — the top-tariff Paper 1 fourth question.

Discuss / Examine15 marks

Consider a claim from more than one perspective, exploring assumptions and interrelationships, then move toward a reasoned position — Paper 2 essay command terms.

Evaluate / To what extent15 marks

Weigh strengths and limitations, or the extent of agreement, to reach an overall justified judgement — the top-tariff Paper 2 essay command terms.

Recommend / Synthesise (HL Paper 3)HL only

Analyse an unseen stimulus, recommend a justified course of action, and synthesise across a global political challenge — the HL-only Paper 3 skills.

What Examiners Expect

Match your answer depth to the marks available.

Paper 1 — identify & explainThe first question rewards specific points taken from a source; the second rewards a reasoned explanation that uses a source and your own understanding, not just a re-description.

Example questions:

  • "Two or three precise points lifted directly from the source"
  • "An explanation that links a source to a clear "because""
  • "Own understanding added to the source, not a paraphrase of it"

On the explain question, use the source AS evidence for a reasoned point — don’t simply restate what it says.

Paper 1 — compare and contrastThe compare-and-contrast question is marked on linked similarities AND differences that refer to both sources in a running comparison, not two separate summaries.

Example questions:

  • "Running comparisons ("both sources…", "whereas Source B…")"
  • "Covering both similarity AND difference, not just one side"
  • "Referring to both sources throughout, point by point"

Never write about one source then the other — weave them together in each comparative point.

Paper 1 — evaluate (sources + own knowledge)The fourth question is marked on how well you combine ALL the sources with your own detailed knowledge to build a synthesised, evaluative answer that reaches a supported judgement.

Example questions:

  • "Grouping the sources by argument, not summarising each in turn"
  • "Adding precise own knowledge — named actors, cases, and examples beyond the sources"
  • "A judgement that directly answers the exact claim in the question"

This is not a source summary — group sources into arguments, weave in own knowledge, and reach a conclusion.

Paper 2 — essay markbands (AO3)The thematic essays are marked on markbands: a focused, evaluative argument that explores diverse perspectives, precise contemporary support, engagement with counter-arguments, and a justified judgement sit in the top band.

Example questions:

  • "A brief plan that answers the exact command term before you write"
  • "Each paragraph making one argued point supported by a specific, recent example"
  • "Perspectives explored AND weighed, ending in a clear judgement"

The top-band discriminator is evaluation — a description of viewpoints with no weighing caps in the middle bands.

Global Politics SL-Specific Skills

These concepts appear throughout Global Politics SL exams. Master them to score higher.

Drill the four Paper 1 questions

Paper 1 always follows the same shape: identify, explain-using-a-source, compare-and-contrast, and an evaluation using the sources with your own knowledge. Practise each until the technique is automatic — especially the final evaluation, where most Paper 1 marks are won.

Use the four key concepts as tools

Power, sovereignty, legitimacy and interdependence are analytical tools, not just definitions. Frame answers around them — who holds power, whether it is legitimate, how sovereignty is challenged, how actors depend on each other — to lift your analysis.

Build a contemporary case-study bank

For each thematic study keep two or three detailed, recent examples (ideally from the last two decades) — with named actors, places and outcomes — so you can support whatever the question asks with precise, current evidence.

Explore perspectives AND evaluate them

"Discuss", "examine", "evaluate", and "to what extent" all demand more than one perspective explored AND weighed against each other, ending in a judgement. Underline the command term, plan both sides, then decide — the evaluation is the top-band skill.

Use sources with your own knowledge

On the Paper 1 evaluation, group the sources into arguments and add precise own knowledge beyond them; on Paper 2, support every claim with a specific example. Source evidence plus wider context is what reaches the top band.

HL: rehearse recommend and synthesise

HL students sit Paper 3 on a global political challenge — borders, environment or equality. Practise analysing an unseen stimulus, recommending a justified course of action, and synthesising across the challenge, rather than just describing it.

Common Global Politics SL Mistakes to Avoid

Learn from others' mistakes. These cost students marks every exam session.

Describing viewpoints instead of evaluating them

Explore more than one perspective AND weigh them against each other, then reach a justified judgement — evaluation is what lifts an essay into the top band.

Summarising the two sources separately on compare-and-contrast

Write a running comparison — "both sources…", "whereas Source B…" — covering similarities and differences point by point, referring to both throughout.

Treating the Paper 1 evaluation as a source summary

Group the sources into arguments, add your own detailed knowledge beyond them, and reach a supported judgement — do not just describe each source in turn.

Vague, dateless evidence

Use precise, contemporary examples with named actors, places and outcomes. "Some countries did this" earns far less than a specific, recent, named case.

Ignoring the key concepts

Frame answers around power, sovereignty, legitimacy and interdependence — using them as analytical tools signals conceptual understanding to the examiner.

Running out of time on the essays

Paper 2 is two essays in 1h 45m — budget time for each, leave time to plan, and do not let one essay eat into the other.

Engagement Project

30% of final grade • ≤ 2,000 words

An individual engagement project: you engage with a political issue of your choice, then write a report analysing it through the tools of political science and reflecting on your engagement. It links a real-world issue to the course concepts, and is completed before the exams and marked out of 24 at SL.

Marking Criteria

Analysis of the political issue9 marks
Links to course content & concepts9 marks
Reflection on the engagement6 marks

Tips for Top Marks

  • Choose a specific, current political issue you can genuinely engage with and research.
  • Analyse the issue using the key concepts — power, sovereignty, legitimacy and interdependence.
  • Link your issue to the course content and to more than one perspective.
  • Reflect honestly on what the engagement taught you about the issue and about political science.
  • Reference your sources properly and support claims with specific evidence.
  • Edit to the 2,000-word limit — a focused, analytical report beats a padded one.

Ready to Practice?

Apply these exam skills with our Global Politics SL practice questions. Get instant AI feedback that shows exactly what scored marks and how to improve.

Start Global Politics SL PracticeAsk AI Tutor