aimnova.
DashboardMy LearningPaper MasteryStudy Plan

Aimnova site navigation

Stay in the loop

Get the latest study resources and updates

New features, study tips and exam insights — straight to your inbox.

IB Diploma

  • IB Past Papers
  • IB Study Notes
  • IB Question Bank
  • IB Mock Exams
  • IB Revision

IB Subjects

  • IB Math AA
  • IB Math AI
  • IB Economics
  • IB Business Management
  • IB Physics
  • IB Biology
  • View all IB subjects→

IB Past Papers

  • IB Math AA HL Past Papers
  • IB Math AA SL Past Papers
  • IB Math AI HL Past Papers
  • IB Math AI SL Past Papers
  • IB Economics HL Past Papers
  • IB Economics SL Past Papers
  • IB ESS Past Papers
  • View all past papers→

Study Resources

  • Study Notes
  • Question Bank
  • Mock Exams
  • Flashcards
  • Revision Guide
  • Exam Skills
  • Command Terms
  • Grade Calculator
  • Exam Timetable 2026

Aimnova

  • Features
  • Pricing
  • For Teachers
  • For Schools
  • For Parents
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact
aimnova.

AI-powered study platform for smarter revision, past-paper analysis and examiner-style feedback.

TermsPrivacyCookies·© 2026 Aimnova. All rights reserved.4d879c2

Aimnova is not affiliated with or endorsed by the International Baccalaureate Organization (IB).

NotesESS HLTopic 5.2The Green Revolution
Back to ESS HL Topics
5.2.77 min read

The Green Revolution (ESS HL)

IB Environmental Systems and Societies • Unit 5

Exam preparation

Practice the questions examiners actually ask

Our question bank mirrors real IB exam papers. Practice under timed conditions and track your progress across topics.

Start Practicing

Contents

  • The Green Revolution at Higher Level
  • What the Green Revolution was
  • How it raised yields
  • The benefits: more food, less land
  • The environmental costs
  • Economic and social costs, and who was left out
  • Why it depends on fossil fuels
  • Exam-style question
The Green Revolution at Higher Level: Different examples from SL: IR8 rice, world cereal output on the same land, Indonesia's planthopper crisis and sub-Saharan Africa. At HL, link this to the economics and ethics of farming (HL.b) and to high-tech farming today (5.2.16).

Practise this as you read

  • Explain how each input raised yields.
  • Evaluate the Green Revolution: benefits and costs.

Free preview

This is the free notes preview

You're reading the free notes. Aimnova Pro unlocks the full study experience — and you can try it with your first topic free to keep:

  • FlashcardsLock in vocabulary and key terms with spaced repetition.
  • Practice questionsAnswer exam-style questions and get instant AI marking.
  • Mock exams & past-paper vaultSit full mocks and see exactly how examiners award marks.
  • Personalised study planA daily plan built around your exam date and weak areas.
Start Studying Free Full access to Aimnova Pro · cancel anytime
More food from the same fields: The Green Revolution (also called the Third Agricultural Revolution) began in the 1950s and 1960s. New high-yielding varieties were grown with irrigation, synthetic fertilizer and pesticides, so poorer countries could grow far more food and improve their food security.

The points to remember

  • When: the 1950s and 1960s, spreading through Asia and Latin America.
  • What: high-yielding crops plus irrigation, synthetic fertilizer and pesticides.
  • Aim: more food per hectare, to increase food security as populations grew.
  • Criticized for its environmental, economic and sociocultural consequences.
  • It did not happen in all developing countries.
Remember it as: New seeds, plus water, plus fertilizer, plus spray.

Example (HL): IR8, the 'miracle rice'. In 1966 the International Rice Research Institute in the Philippines released IR8, a short rice that could take heavy fertilizer without falling over. With irrigation it often doubled the rice harvested from each hectare.

See how examiners mark answers

Answer exam-style questions with model answers. Learn exactly what earns marks and what doesn't.

Try Exam Vault FreeYour first topic is free to keep • No credit card required

Each part of the package removed a limiting factor. Together they raised the yield: the crop harvested from each hectare.

Seeds

  • IR8 had short, stiff stems and ripened in about 130 days, so two crops a year were possible.

Water

  • Canals and pumps kept the paddies flooded in the dry season, so water no longer limited growth.

Fertilizer

  • Nitrogen fertilizer raised yields because the short stems did not collapse under the heavier grain.

Sprays

  • Insecticides protected the dense, uniform fields from pests such as the brown planthopper.

The points to remember

  • High-yielding varieties: more grain per plant, short stems, faster growth, more harvests a year.
  • Irrigation: water is no longer the limiting factor.
  • Synthetic fertilizer: soil nutrients are no longer limiting.
  • Pesticides: less of the crop lost to pests and weeds.
  • Machines: more work on bigger areas with fewer people.
  • Soil conservation methods cut soil degradation on the more intensively used land.
  • So production rose far faster than the area farmed.
Line graph of world cereals as an index with 1961 = 100: production rises to 341 by 2020 while area harvested stays between 100 and 112
World cereal production more than tripled on about the same area.

The Green Revolution's supporters point to what it achieved for people and for land.

The points to remember

  • More food: cereal harvests in Asia rose fast and famines were avoided.
  • Food security: countries that imported grain became self-sufficient.
  • Cheaper food: bigger harvests lowered grain prices for poor buyers.
  • Land spared: more food from the same area, so less forest was cleared for farms.
  • Incomes: farmers who could afford the package earned more; rural jobs in trade grew.
Remember it as: More food, less hunger, less land.

Example (HL): land spared and Indonesia. One study estimated that without the new varieties, between about 18 and 27 million more hectares would have been farmed by 2004. Indonesia, once the world's largest rice importer, grew enough rice for itself by 1984.

Study smarter, not longer

Most students waste 40% of study time on topics they already know. Our AI tracks your progress and optimizes every minute.

Try Smart Study FreeYour first topic is free to keep • No credit card required

The same inputs that raised yields put pressure on water, soil and wildlife.

The points to remember

  • Groundwater pumped faster than rain refills it: water tables fall.
  • Irrigation in dry areas leaves salt behind: salinization; poor drainage causes waterlogging.
  • Fertilizer runs off into rivers: eutrophication; soils lose organic matter.
  • Pesticides kill non-target species, poison people and breed resistant pests.
  • Monocultures of a few varieties: old local varieties lost, less genetic diversity.
  • More burning of crop waste and fuel: air pollution and greenhouse gases.
Remember it as: Water down, salt up, runoff out, resistance in.

Example (HL): Indonesia's brown planthopper. Heavy insecticide spraying in the 1970s and 1980s killed the spiders and other predators of the brown planthopper, while the pest itself became resistant. Outbreaks destroyed huge areas of rice. In 1986 Indonesia banned 57 insecticides on rice and trained farmers in integrated pest management.

Critics also point to who gained, who lost, and who was left out.

Economic

  • Seed, fertilizer, pesticide and pumps must be bought every year.
  • Farmers with land, credit and irrigation gained most; small farmers fell into debt.
  • Machines replaced landless labourers.

Sociocultural

  • Gaps between rich and poor farmers, and between regions, grew.
  • Traditional knowledge and local seeds were lost.
  • Diets narrowed: wheat and rice replaced millets and pulses.

The points to remember

  • It did not happen in all developing countries.
  • Much of sub-Saharan Africa missed out: rain-fed farms, little irrigation.
  • Its main crops (cassava, sorghum, millet) had few new varieties at first.
  • Poor roads, little credit, and high fertilizer prices held it back.

Example (HL): sub-Saharan Africa. Between the 1960s and 2000, cereal yields in South Asia roughly doubled, while in sub-Saharan Africa they stayed at about 1 tonne per hectare, and the population grew much faster than the harvest.

Practice with exam-style questions

Answer exam-style questions and get AI feedback that shows you exactly what examiners want to see in a full-marks response.

Try Practice FreeYour first topic is free to keep • No credit card required

Plants need nitrogen, but most of it is in the air as a gas they cannot use. The Haber-Bosch process fixes it into fertilizer.

The points to remember

  • Higher yields depended on fixing nitrogen into synthetic fertilizer.
  • The hydrogen comes mostly from natural gas, and the process needs high heat and pressure.
  • So fertilizer production is fossil-fuel dependent and releases carbon dioxide.
  • Tractors, pumps and pesticides add more oil and electricity use.
  • If gas becomes scarce or costly, fertilizer and food prices rise.
Remember it as: Gas in, ammonia out, food up, carbon up.

Example (HL): the carbon cost of ammonia. Making one tonne of ammonia from natural gas releases about 2 tonnes of carbon dioxide. Ammonia making uses about 1-2% of the world's energy, yet the fertilizer it produces helps feed around half of the world's people.

How this comes up: Paper 1 gives graphs of farm output and fertilizer use, then asks you to explain how output rose while fewer people worked on farms [4].
Line graph, United States 1950 to 1980, index 1950 = 100: farm output rises to 160 while farm workers fall to 37
Figure 1 for the question below.

Read both figures together: Figure 2 shows one of the reasons for the change in Figure 1.

Line graph of nitrogen fertilizer used on United States farms: 0.9 million tonnes in 1950 rising to 10.8 million tonnes in 1980
Figure 2 for the question below.
IB-style questionExplain[4 marks]

Figure 1 shows farm output and the number of farm workers in the United States from 1950 to 1980. Figure 2 shows nitrogen fertilizer use.

With reference to Figures 1 and 2, explain how farm output increased while the number of farm workers decreased.

Model answer plan

See the mark-by-mark plan — for / against / judgement, with marking guidance — in study mode.

Claim your free topic

Try an IB Exam Question — Free AI Feedback

Test yourself on The Green Revolution. Write your answer and get instant AI feedback — just like a real IB examiner.

In the 1960s, farmers in Punjab, India, changed the way they grew wheat.

two of the inputs the Green Revolution used to increase crop yields.
[2 marks]

Related ESS HL Topics

Continue learning with these related topics from the same unit:

5.1.1Soil as a system
5.1.2What soil is made of
5.1.3Soil profiles and horizons
5.1.4Inputs to soil
View all ESS HL topics

Practice with flashcards

Spaced repetition flashcards for The Green Revolution

Improve your exam technique

Command terms, paper structure, and mark-scheme tips for ESS HL

Previous
5.2.6Nomadic pastoralism and slash-and-burn
Next
Synthetic fertilizers and natural productivity5.2.8

12 practice questions on The Green Revolution

Students who practiced this topic on Aimnova scored 82% on average. Try free practice questions and get instant AI feedback.

Try 3 Free QuestionsView All ESS HL Topics