Technology and behaviour (HL) (Psychology HL)

In one line: Digital technology now shapes how we think, relate and feel — for better and for worse.

The HL extension of technology layers onto every context. Technology — smartphones, social media, gaming, online tools — affects behaviour, cognition and wellbeing across health, development, relationships and learning.

This links to the concept of change (technology changes how we behave) and causality (but the evidence is often correlational, so causal claims must be careful). HL note: assessed on Paper 3, a source-based data paper.

Memory hook: Double-edged screen. Technology can help or harm behaviour and wellbeing.

Key idea: Technology has both benefits and costs — and the effect often depends on how it's used.

Take social media and a teenager's wellbeing. Active use (messaging friends) can support connection; passive scrolling and social comparison can lower mood; and disrupted sleep harms wellbeing. Technology changes behaviour, but whether the effect is good or bad often depends on use — so simple claims mislead.

Go further — higher-level insight: Most evidence here is correlational. We can measure that screen time and low mood go together, but not easily that one causes the other — a third variable (like existing distress) or reverse causation may explain it. Flagging this is essential for Paper-3 evaluation.

Key idea: Technology research is topical and important but mostly correlational and fast-changing.

So technology research is timely and practically important, but a good Paper-3 evaluation stresses it is mostly correlational (so causal claims are risky), that self-reported use is unreliable, that effects depend on how technology is used, and that the fast pace of change makes findings quickly dated. Read the data with these limits in mind.

Watch out: 'Screens cause harm' overstates it. A correlation between screen time and low wellbeing doesn't prove screens are the cause — reverse causation and third variables are live possibilities.