In one line: Our earliest bond with a caregiver helps shape how we relate to others for years to come.
In the human development context, the development of the self is a key area of study. Attachment is central: it is the first close relationship and a foundation for later development.
This links to the concept of change: attachment shapes how the self develops over time. Studies here are illustrative — you can use hypothetical or real examples in your own words, without memorising them.
Memory hook: First bond, lasting blueprint. Early attachment influences later relationships.
Free preview
This is the free notes preview
You're reading the free notes. Aimnova Pro unlocks the full study experience — and you can try it with your first topic free to keep:
- FlashcardsLock in vocabulary and key terms with spaced repetition.
- Practice questionsAnswer exam-style questions and get instant AI marking.
- Mock exams & past-paper vaultSit full mocks and see exactly how examiners award marks.
- Personalised study planA daily plan built around your exam date and weak areas.
Key idea: Attachment comes in types, forms through sensitive caregiving, and is explained by all three approaches.
Attachment at a glance
Secure attachment
The infant uses the caregiver as a safe base — comforted by them, confident to explore. Linked to sensitive caregiving.
Insecure attachment
Anxious or avoidant patterns, often where caregiving is inconsistent or unresponsive.
Three explanations
Biological (an innate drive to bond for survival), cognitive (an internal 'working model' of relationships), sociocultural (caregiving norms vary by culture).
Secure · Insecure · Shaped by care
Take a child with a responsive caregiver: they form a secure attachment, build a positive working model (cognitive), and this may support confident relationships later (change). Another child with inconsistent care may develop an insecure pattern. Culture also shapes what caregiving looks like (sociocultural).
Go further — higher-level insight: Early attachment influences, but doesn't fix, the future. A secure start is helpful, but later relationships and experiences can change a person's patterns — attachment is a strong influence, not a life sentence. Noting this avoids over-determinism, a key evaluation point.
Feeling unprepared for exams?
Get a clear study plan, practice with real questions, and know exactly where you stand before exam day. No more guessing.
Key idea: Attachment theory is influential and well-evidenced but risks over-determinism and cultural bias.
Strengths and limitations
| Strengths and limitations | Strengths | Limitations |
|---|---|---|
| Evidence | Supported by observation of infant behaviour | Often correlational — early attachment linked to, not proven to cause, later outcomes |
| Scope | Explains later relationships and emotional development | Risk of over-determinism (ignoring later change) |
| Culture | Attachment appears across cultures | 'Secure' defined by Western norms — possible cultural bias (etic) |
So attachment research offers a powerful account of early development, but a good evaluation notes it is often correlational, can be over-deterministic (people do change), and may impose Western definitions of 'good' attachment on other cultures — an imposed-etic problem.
Watch out: Correlation again. A link between early attachment and later outcomes does not prove attachment caused them — other factors across childhood matter too.