The big idea: Travel far enough and everything looks different — food, dress, manners, beliefs. So is there anything at all that shows up in every human culture?
What hangs on the answer: If yes, that's strong evidence for a shared nature. If no, maybe 'human nature' is a myth.
A human universal is a trait present everywhere. Its rival is cultural relativism — the idea that customs vary so much that nothing is fixed across all people.
Free preview
This is the free notes preview
You're reading the free notes. Aimnova Pro unlocks the full study experience — and you can try it with your first topic free to keep:
- FlashcardsLock in vocabulary and key terms with spaced repetition.
- Practice questionsAnswer exam-style questions and get instant AI marking.
- Mock exams & past-paper vaultSit full mocks and see exactly how examiners award marks.
- Personalised study planA daily plan built around your exam date and weak areas.
Start Studying Free Full access to Aimnova Pro · cancel anytime
Look past the surface differences and some patterns keep repeating.
What seems to turn up everywhere: Anthropologists who compare hundreds of cultures find striking repeats: language, some form of family, music and dance, telling right from wrong, fear of death, jokes and laughter, and marking birth and death with ritual. Different in detail — the same in outline. That pattern is the best evidence that we share a nature.
Checkpoint — universals: In one line: the same outlines (language, family, morality) show up everywhere, so something must be built in. Now the challenge from the other direction.
Learn what examiners really want
See exactly what to write to score full marks. Our AI shows you model answers and the key phrases examiners look for.
Try AI Feedback FreeYour first topic is free to keep • No credit card required
The rival view says the differences run deeper than the similarities.
How far customs really differ: What one culture calls polite, another calls insulting. What counts as a crime, a family, a fair share, even a normal emotion, shifts dramatically from place to place. The cultural relativist says: since values vary this much, there is no single 'human nature' telling everyone how to live.
Universals win
- Strength: the same outlines really do repeat everywhere
- Strength: explains why we can understand distant cultures at all
- Weakness: each 'universal' looks very different up close
Variation wins
- Strength: values and customs differ dramatically
- Strength: warns us against calling our own ways 'natural'
- Weakness: if all values are relative, we can't condemn ANY cruelty
Go further — higher-level insight: The strongest position splits the difference: the outlines are universal (every culture has language, family, morality) while the content is local (which language, which rules). That lets you keep a shared human nature AND take cultural difference seriously — and it dodges the trap where 'all values are relative' means no cruelty can ever be criticised.