By 1991, the Soviet Union was crumbling. Gorbachev's reforms had opened the door to change, but hardliners in Moscow were terrified of losing power.
In August 1991, a group of senior Communist officials — later nicknamed the Gang of Eight — tried to seize control while Gorbachev was on holiday. They wanted to stop his reforms and save the USSR.
Yeltsin's tank moment: Boris Yeltsin, president of the Russian republic, climbed onto a tank outside the Russian parliament and rallied crowds and soldiers to resist the coup. Within three days, it collapsed. Yeltsin emerged as Russia's most powerful leader — and the USSR itself dissolved by December 1991.
But defeating the coup did not settle who should run the new Russia, or how much power the president should hold. That fight exploded two years later.
- September 1993 — Yeltsin dissolved parliament by decree, even though the constitution did not clearly give him that power
- Parliament refused to leave — deputies barricaded themselves inside the White House (the parliament building) and declared Yeltsin removed from office
- 4 October 1993 — Yeltsin ordered tanks to shell the White House, ending the standoff by force; over 100 people died
- December 1993 — A new constitution, giving the president much stronger powers, was approved by referendum
Why this matters for the inquiry question: Both the 1991 coup and the 1993 crisis show that Russia's transition away from communism was not smooth — it was contested, violent at times, and left the new state's rules still being fought over.
Reading a source: a photograph from 4 October 1993
Imagine a source showing tanks firing on the White House. Its content tells you what happened — smoke, tanks, a damaged building. But to use it well, ask about its origin: was it taken by a Russian state photographer, or a foreign news agency? That shapes whether it was meant to show government strength or expose violence against parliament.
Free preview
This is the free notes preview
You're reading the free notes. Aimnova Pro unlocks the full study experience — and you can try it free for 7 days:
- FlashcardsLock in vocabulary and key terms with spaced repetition.
- Practice questionsAnswer exam-style questions and get instant AI marking.
- Mock exams & past-paper vaultSit full mocks and see exactly how examiners award marks.
- Personalised study planA daily plan built around your exam date and weak areas.
Political chaos was only half the story. Ordinary Russians were also living through an economic earthquake.
From January 1992, the government applied shock therapy — Soviet-era price controls vanished almost overnight, and state industries were rapidly sold off.
Hyperinflation hits hard: Prices rocketed by around 2,500% during 1992 alone. Savings that a family had built up over a lifetime became almost worthless within months.
Workers who went unpaid for months, and pensioners whose savings had evaporated, responded the only way they could: strikes and street protests spread across Russian cities through the early-to-mid 1990s, especially among miners and factory workers.
Winners of the transition
- Well-connected former officials and managers who bought state firms cheaply
- Became known as oligarchs — a small elite controlling oil, metals and media
- Gained huge political influence, including backing Yeltsin's 1996 re-election
Losers of the transition
- Workers whose wages went unpaid for months at a time
- Pensioners whose life savings were wiped out by inflation
- Ordinary families facing shortages and falling living standards
Into this gap between winners and losers stepped organized crime. With weak policing and state assets up for grabs, criminal gangs moved into business, extortion, and even banking — a period Russians grimly nicknamed the 'wild 1990s'.
Content vs. perspective, side by side: A source from a struggling factory worker and a source from a newly rich businessman could describe the SAME year completely differently. Neither is 'wrong' — their content reflects very different lived experiences, which is exactly what a Q3 perspectives answer should explore.
See how examiners mark answers
Access past paper questions with model answers. Learn exactly what earns marks and what doesn't.
Political and economic strain was not the only challenge. Russia's own borders were also under pressure.
Chechnya, a republic in the North Caucasus, declared independence from Russia in 1991. Yeltsin refused to accept this, fearing other regions would follow.
December 1994
Russian forces invaded Chechnya to crush the independence movement and retake the capital, Grozny.
1995–1996
Brutal urban fighting devastated Grozny; Russian troops suffered heavy, unexpected losses against Chechen fighters.
August 1996
A ceasefire agreement (Khasavyurt Accord) ended the war; Russian forces withdrew, and Chechnya gained de facto self-rule.
Invade → bog down → withdraw: a war that damaged the army's reputation, not fixed the problem.
Impact on the new Russian state: The war exposed a poorly funded, poorly led army and battered Yeltsin's authority just as he faced re-election in 1996. It also showed how fragile Russia's control over its own territory really was.
Worked example: using context to judge a source
Suppose Source A is a 1995 speech by a Russian general defending the Chechnya operation, and Source B is a 1995 diary entry by a Grozny resident describing the bombing.
For Q2 (context): the general's speech was made for a domestic audience to justify military action — expect it to downplay civilian suffering. The diary was private, not written for publication — it may capture the war's cost more directly, but reflects only one person's experience, not the whole picture.
Neither source is simply 'true' or 'false' — context shapes what each one is useful FOR, which is the skill Q2 rewards.