By the late 900s, Norse sailors led by Erik the Red had settled Greenland. A few decades later, their families pushed even further west — reaching the coast of North America itself.
This inquiry asks: what innovations took place as the Norse tried to live in these new lands? "Innovation" here doesn't just mean tools. It means new ways of surviving, eating, and dealing with people who were already there.
Two new lands, two different stories: Greenland became a lasting Norse colony (occupied for centuries). Vinland, further south and west, was only settled briefly — but it left behind the clearest physical proof of Norse presence in North America.
The most famous Vinland site is L'Anse aux Meadows, on the northern tip of Newfoundland, Canada. It was excavated in the 1960s by archaeologists Helge and Anne Stine Ingstad, and it remains the only confirmed Norse settlement anywhere in North America.
- Turf-walled buildings — built in the same style as Norse halls in Iceland and Greenland, not like any Indigenous structure of the period
- An iron smithy — proof the Norse were working smelted iron on-site, a skill Indigenous groups nearby did not practise then
- A bronze cloak pin and a spindle whorl — small personal items (a fastener for clothing, a tool for spinning wool) that place Norse people, including women, actually living there
How this evidence answers the inquiry question: The sagas (Icelandic stories written down later) claim the Norse reached Vinland. L'Anse aux Meadows is the archaeological source that turns that claim into a historical fact a Paper 1 answer can cite with confidence — because a saga's content is a claim, but a dug-up smithy is physical evidence.
Even so, L'Anse aux Meadows was only used for a few years, not permanently settled. That short use is itself a clue — something made staying difficult, which the next sections explore.
Free preview
This is the free notes preview
You're reading the free notes. Aimnova Pro unlocks the full study experience — and you can try it with your first topic free to keep:
- FlashcardsLock in vocabulary and key terms with spaced repetition.
- Practice questionsAnswer exam-style questions and get instant AI marking.
- Mock exams & past-paper vaultSit full mocks and see exactly how examiners award marks.
- Personalised study planA daily plan built around your exam date and weak areas.
Greenland's coast is rocky, cold, and has only a short summer growing season. The Norse could not simply farm the way they had in Norway or Iceland — they had to adapt.
Pastoral farming
Norse settlers kept cattle, sheep, and goats on the limited grassland near the fjords, using them for meat, milk, and wool.
Hunting
They hunted seals along the coast and caribou inland — seal fat and meat became a major part of the Greenland diet.
Fishing
Fish (and later, walrus for ivory and hide rope) supplemented the diet and gave Greenlanders a valuable export to trade back to Europe.
Farm what little grass allows, hunt and fish for the rest — three strategies stacked, not one alone.
Content, not just a list: For Q1 [6] (content), don't just name farming/hunting/fishing. Explain why each was needed — e.g. "grassland was scarce, so hunting seal filled the gap crops and livestock couldn't" — because that shows you understand the source's content, not just its vocabulary.
Archaeologists know this mainly from midden heaps — ancient rubbish piles full of animal bones. Counting which bones appear, and in what quantities, lets historians work out the Greenlanders' diet even though no Norse settler wrote a shopping list.
How to read this source: a Greenland midden: Content: A midden at a Greenland farm site contains mostly seal and caribou bones, with fewer cattle bones than at similar Icelandic sites. Use: this content directly answers "how did the Norse adapt their food production?" — it shows wild food (hunting) mattered more in Greenland than pastoral farming alone, because the environment forced that balance.
See how examiners mark answers
Answer exam-style questions with model answers. Learn exactly what earns marks and what doesn't.
Skrælingjar Skrælingjar is the word the Norse used for the Indigenous peoples they encountered — likely including Inuit groups in Greenland and Indigenous peoples of Vinland.
What we know about these encounters comes almost entirely from two sagas: The Saga of Erik the Red and The Saga of the Greenlanders. Both were composed in Iceland and only written down over 200 years after the events they describe.
Trade
- The sagas describe Norse settlers offering red cloth and dairy products
- In exchange, the Skrælingjar offered furs
- Shows a working relationship existed, at least sometimes
Conflict
- The sagas also describe violent skirmishes breaking out
- Þorvald Eiriksson (Erik the Red's son) is said to have been killed in a clash
- Fear of continued attacks is presented as a reason Vinland was abandoned
Perspectives across the sources: For Q3 [12], notice that the sagas themselves hold two different perspectives at once — Skrælingjar as trading partners AND as a threat. A strong answer uses this tension, rather than picking only one side, because real relationships in the sources were not simple.
A historian must ask: who told this story, and why? The sagas were composed by descendants of the Norse settlers, not by the Skrælingjar. That means we only have one side's memory of what happened.
Context shapes use: For Q2 [6] (context), the sagas' origin (Norse-Icelandic, generations later) and purpose (entertaining, honouring ancestors) both matter. They may exaggerate Norse boldness or simplify the Skrælingjar's motives — so content about conflict should be used carefully, cross-checked against what archaeology can and cannot confirm.