The big idea: Compare HOW each writer uses a technique, not just whether both use it: same device, different effect — or different devices reaching the same effect. Always tie technique to meaning.
Two writers can use the very same device and mean completely opposite things — and that gap is what a Paper 2 comparison should explore.
Don't stop at ‘both use imagery’ (true of almost every book). Ask: what KIND of imagery, to what EFFECT, and how does that differ? Two poets might both use light imagery — one for hope, one for exposure and threat. Comparing the effect, not just the label, is the skill.
How to compare techniques
Name the shared technique
Both use imagery / structure / a motif / a narrator — the common ground.
Compare the EFFECT, not the label
‘Both use light imagery’ is weak; ‘but A's light means hope, B's means exposure’ is strong.
Or: different devices, same effect
Sometimes two writers reach the SAME effect by different means — also a rich comparison.
Always tie to meaning
End every comparison on what the difference REVEALS about each work.
The key move: Compare technique → effect → meaning in BOTH works: same device with different effects, or different devices with the same effect. Never stop at ‘both use X’.
Free preview
This is the free notes preview
You're reading the free notes. Aimnova Pro unlocks the full study experience — and you can try it with your first topic free to keep:
- FlashcardsLock in vocabulary and key terms with spaced repetition.
- Practice questionsAnswer exam-style questions and get instant AI marking.
- Mock exams & past-paper vaultSit full mocks and see exactly how examiners award marks.
- Personalised study planA daily plan built around your exam date and weak areas.
Why it matters in the exam: Criterion B rewards analysis and evaluation of authorial choices, including how the two works compare. Comparing HOW techniques work (not just naming shared devices) is what turns a Paper 2 essay from listing into analysis.
Compare the use of a first-person narrator in two works: Work A's narrator is honest and reliable; Work B's narrator is subtly self-deceiving.
Model answer plan
See the mark-by-mark plan — for / against / judgement, with marking guidance — in study mode.
Watch out: ‘Both use imagery / a metaphor / a narrator’ is almost always TRUE and almost always WEAK. Push to the effect and meaning, and how those DIFFER, or it isn't really a comparison.