IB Digital Society Revision Guide

Everything you need to revise for IB Digital Society at SL and HL — every prescribed area for inquiry, the named real-world examples the markbands reward, paper-by-paper technique, and a ten-week plan.

The three command terms that decide your grade

Digital society scaffolds its command terms to assessment objectives, and the term tells you exactly how deep to go. Getting this wrong is the commonest way a student who knows the content still loses marks.

Identify / Describe (AO1)

Identify wants a name and nothing else. Describe wants a detailed account — what happens, in order — but still no reasons. If you find yourself writing "because", you have answered a different question.

Explain (AO2)

Give a detailed account INCLUDING reasons or causes. The word "because" should appear. A two-mark explain is one mark for the claim and one for the development, so a bare claim halves your score.

To what extent / Evaluate / Discuss (AO3)

These are the 8- and 12-mark parts, marked against markbands rather than by counting points. They need a real counter-argument and a judgement you commit to. Without a counter-argument you cannot pass the middle band; without a judgement you cannot enter the top one.

What do you need for a 7 in Digital Society?

Weightings differ by level, so the same paper is worth different amounts to you and to a friend at the other level. Work out where your marks actually come from before deciding what to revise.

Know the papers

The biggest revision mistake is studying content but ignoring format. Know exactly what each paper asks for before you start practising.

Paper 1 — Structured questionsSL + HL1h 30m (SL) / 2h 15m (HL)40% (SL) / 35% (HL)

Questions set in real-world scenarios, each running part a (knowledge, 6), part b (application, 6) and part c (evaluation, 8, marked against markbands). SL is printed FOUR questions and answers two. HL Section A prints only three of them, and Section B adds two 12-mark extended responses on the HL extension, of which you answer one.

  • Choose your questions on part c, not part a — part c is 8 of the 20 marks.
  • Roughly 40 minutes per question: 8 on part a, 10 on part b, 20 on part c.
  • Part c expects your own studied examples as well as the scenario on the page.
  • SL question 4 has no HL counterpart, so do not revise from an HL paper alone if you sit SL.
Paper 2 — Source-basedSL + HL1 hour 15 minutes30% (SL) / 20% (HL)

The same paper at both levels. A separate booklet supplies four sources — text, data, diagrams, infographics — and four compulsory questions: read one source (2), analyse one (4), compare and contrast two (6), then synthesise all of them with your own knowledge (12).

  • Read the sources before the questions and note each one’s claim in the margin.
  • Question 3 must interleave the sources; a paragraph on each cannot reach the top band.
  • Question 4 says "and your own knowledge" — an answer built only from the booklet is capped.
  • Question 4 alone is half the paper. Protect at least 30 minutes for it.
Paper 3 — The intervention paperHL only1 hour 15 minutes25% (HL)

A statement of 250–400 words naming a real-world challenge is released before the exam, so the research is homework. Four compulsory questions work through the scenario and the source booklet and end by asking you to recommend one of two interventions.

  • Before the exam, build one page on the released challenge: who is affected, what is already being tried, what each approach costs.
  • Question 4 wants a decision. "Both have merits" cannot reach the top band.
  • Judge interventions against stated criteria — cost, reach, who is excluded, how you would know it worked.
  • Say why you rejected the other intervention; that is the counter-argument the markband asks for.
Inquiry projectSL + HL30 hours30% (SL) / 20% (HL)

Your own investigation into the impacts and implications of a digital system, submitted as a process document of no more than 1,500 words plus a recorded presentation of no more than 10 minutes. Marked on inquiry focus, sources, analysis and evaluation, trends and developments, and communication.

  • Pick a real-world example with genuinely different sources available — criterion B depends on it.
  • Your inquiry focus is a question, not a topic.
  • Plan for trends and developments from the start; most projects bolt criterion D on at the end.
  • Both word and time limits are enforced. Write to them, not past them.

10-week revision timeline

Built around the one thing this subject rewards above all others: a bank of specific, current, nameable examples you can reach for under pressure.

Weeks 1–2Build the case bank
  • Collect about twenty real examples you can name with a date and a place
  • For each, write what happened, who it affected, and which concepts it illustrates
  • Check anything older than three years still reads as current
Weeks 3–4Content topics, dilemmas first
  • Data, algorithms, computers, networks, media, AI, robots
  • Learn each topic’s dilemmas as content — they are the most reliably examined part
  • Attach at least two cases from your bank to every content topic
Weeks 5–6Concepts and contexts as lenses
  • Re-answer an old scenario through a different concept each time
  • Practise asking "whose power shifted?" and "what does this system feed back into?"
  • Name the context every scenario sits in before you start writing
Weeks 7–8Source and markband technique
  • Drill Paper 2 question 3 until interleaving is automatic
  • Write part c answers to a plan: argument, counter-argument, judgement
  • At HL, research the pre-released Paper 3 challenge properly
Weeks 9–10Timed papers and targeted repair
  • Full papers under timing, including the choice of which questions to answer
  • Mark your own part c against the markband and find which band you sat in
  • Fix the specific thing the band named — usually a missing counter or a missing judgement

Revise by unit

Units 1–4 are common to SL and HL. Unit 5, the HL extension, is HL only and is examined by Paper 1 Section B and by the whole of Paper 3.

1

Introduction — what is digital society?

Exam weight: Assumed everywhere

contested termdigital dividemilestonesbits and bytesanalogue vs digitaldigitization vs digitalization
2

Concepts — the seven lenses

Exam weight: Analysis in every paper

changeexpressionidentitypowerspacesystemsvalues and ethics
3

Content — data to robots

Exam weight: Most of Paper 1 part a and b

data life cyclealgorithmic biasnetworkssynthetic mediamachine learningautonomy
4

Contexts — where it plays out

Exam weight: Every scenario sits in one

culturaleconomicenvironmentalhealthhuman knowledgepoliticalsocial
5

HL extension — challenges and interventions

Exam weight: Paper 1 Section B + all of Paper 3 (HL)

global well-beinggovernance and human rightssustainable developmentinterventionpre-released statement

IB Digital Society Revision FAQ

Is SL Paper 1 just HL Paper 1 without Section B?

No. The SL paper prints four 20-mark questions and you answer two; HL Section A prints only the first three of them. SL question 4 is SL-exclusive and HL students never see it. The weights differ too — Paper 1 is 40% at SL against 35% at HL, and Paper 2 is 30% at SL against 20%.

How many real-world examples do I actually need?

About twenty you can name with a date and a place, spread so that every content topic has at least two. What matters is not the count but whether you can use one as evidence for a claim rather than mentioning it. One example developed properly beats three named and left undeveloped.

Why does Aimnova not publish predicted topics for Digital Society?

Because only three sittings exist — the course was first assessed in 2024. A topic frequency drawn from three exams describes those three exams and nothing more, and presenting it as a prediction would be inventing confidence we do not have. We will add predictions when there is enough history for a frequency to mean something.

How do I stop a part c answer stalling in the middle band?

Two moves, in this order. Add a genuine counter-argument — an answer with only one side is capped in the middle band whatever else it does. Then commit to a judgement that answers the actual question and follows from the evidence you gave. If the question turns on a slippery word such as "significant" or "acceptable", split the word rather than picking a side at random.

First topic free

Start revising IB Digital Society

Notes on every prescribed area, flashcards for the case bank, and exam-style practice marked against the IB markbands — at SL and HL.

Start Free

No credit card required · No time limit