The big idea: A subtractive technique starts with more material than the part and removes the difference. It works on a 3D mass and on flat sheet alike.
The processes are told apart by what moves: in turning the WORK rotates, in milling the TOOL rotates, in cutting a blade or beam travels along a line, and in abrading many small hard particles each take a little.
Cutting, milling, turning and abrading drawn by what moves in each.
Interactive diagram
Explore the labelled diagram, charts and maps for this topic in full study mode.
Free preview
This is the free notes preview
You're reading the free notes. Aimnova Pro unlocks the full study experience — and you can try it with your first topic free to keep:
- FlashcardsLock in vocabulary and key terms with spaced repetition.
- Practice questionsAnswer exam-style questions and get instant AI marking.
- Mock exams & past-paper vaultSit full mocks and see exactly how examiners award marks.
- Personalised study planA daily plan built around your exam date and weak areas.
| Process | What moves | What it makes |
|---|---|---|
| Cutting | A blade or beam separates material along a line, with the sheet clamped still | Flat shapes from sheet — by saw, shear, laser, water jet or knife; the laser cutter is the one a school workshop owns |
| Milling | The TOOL rotates; the work is clamped and moved past it | Flat faces, slots, pockets, holes and complicated 3D surfaces — mould tools, jigs, machine parts, accurate metal prototypes |
| Turning | The WORK rotates; the tool is moved along and into it | Round shapes only — shafts, spindles, knobs, threads and bores, all about one axis |
| Abrading | Many small hard particles remove a little material at a time | Fine control of size and surface — filing, sanding, grinding, honing, polishing; it holds tolerances a cutter cannot |
The pair students swap: Turning and milling are confused constantly, and the difference is one fact.
Turning: the work spins. That is why it can only make round things. Milling: the tool spins. That is why it can make almost any shape a cutter can reach.
Stop wasting time on topics you know
Our AI identifies your weak areas and focuses your study time where it matters. No more overstudying easy topics.
| What subtractive buys | What it costs |
|---|---|
| Accuracy and surface finish no other category reaches | Everything removed is waste — bought, transported and often processed before being cut away |
| It works on any material, hard or soft | Cutting tools wear and must be replaced, and hard materials wear them fast |
| No tooling to make first, so one part is viable | Cycle times are minutes to hours per part, so it does not scale to volume |
| It is how mould tools and dies are made in the first place | Internal shapes are limited to whatever a cutter can physically reach |
Why it is called wasting: A machined aerospace bracket can start as a block ten times its finished mass, and titanium swarf is expensive waste from an energy-intensive material.
That waste is the argument for additive manufacturing on complicated low-volume parts — and it is worth a mark whenever the two are compared.
How this is tested — explaining how components are produced by wasting techniques. It comes up two ways:
Paper 1 — multiple choice
- Identify a wasting process from a description of what moves.
- Choose the process suited to a stated shape.
Paper 2 — analysing a product
- Explain how a named component is machined.
- Justify a subtractive process against a forming or additive one.
The trap: Swapping milling and turning. Say which part rotates and the rest of the answer stays right.
Explain how a steel shaft with a threaded end and a flat machined along its length is produced.
Model answer plan
See the mark-by-mark plan — for / against / judgement, with marking guidance — in study mode.