The big idea: Strengths and weaknesses are internal to the product and true now.
Opportunities and threats are external and about what is coming.
Miss that axis and all four boxes fill with the same four sentences, and the tool stops telling you anything.
A SWOT filled in on one kettle, with every entry tagged by the lens it came from.
Interactive diagram
Explore the labelled diagram, charts and maps for this topic in full study mode.
Free preview
This is the free notes preview
You're reading the free notes. Aimnova Pro unlocks the full study experience — and you can try it with your first topic free to keep:
- FlashcardsLock in vocabulary and key terms with spaced repetition.
- Practice questionsAnswer exam-style questions and get instant AI marking.
- Mock exams & past-paper vaultSit full mocks and see exactly how examiners award marks.
- Personalised study planA daily plan built around your exam date and weak areas.
The statement is specific: the SWOT is built on function, performance, usability, features and materials. Tagging each entry with its lens stops a SWOT collapsing into four opinions about how the product feels.
| Quadrant | Entries on a stainless kettle |
|---|---|
| Strengths (internal, now) | Performance: boils 1 litre in 2 min 40 s · Materials: survives a dishwasher and a drop · Usability: lid opens with one thumb, tested on 12 users |
| Weaknesses (internal, now) | Performance: 2.1 kg full, above the grip limit for 5th-percentile users · Features: a keep-warm setting none of 12 users touched · Function: the water window is unusable left-handed |
| Opportunities (external, future) | Repairability rules make a serviceable element a selling point · No rival offers a fill-in-place model · Retailers want a plastic-free pack, which suits a metal body |
| Threats (external, future) | Two rivals launched at the same price with a lower fill line · Energy labelling may expose a wide body's wasted heat · Steel price volatility |
The commonest SWOT mistake: Writing "it is heavy" as a weakness and "it could be lighter" as an opportunity.
That is the same fact twice. An opportunity is something outside the product — a market gap, a regulation, a supplier, a rival's absence — that the product could exploit.
Feeling unprepared for exams?
Get a clear study plan, practice with real questions, and know exactly where you stand before exam day. No more guessing.
A SWOT is only worth drawing if it produces a decision
Pair a strength with an opportunity
That is what to PUSH. The stainless body plus the retailers' plastic-free pack: an existing strength meeting an external change.
Pair a weakness with a threat
That is what to FIX FIRST. The full weight plus rivals launching with a lower fill line: a weakness about to be exposed.
Ignore the unpaired entries for now
A weakness nobody is exploiting and a strength nothing needs are both real and neither is urgent. Say so rather than listing everything equally.
Write the pairs as requirements
"Usable one-handed when full" and "element replaceable with hand tools" go straight into the specification, which is where the analysis was heading.
Where the entries come from: Strengths and weaknesses come from your own testing and from stakeholders.
Opportunities and threats come from secondary research: competitor products, regulations coming into force, supplier and material trends. That difference is also why the two halves feel different to write.
How this is tested — analysing a product using SWOT on function, performance, usability, features and materials. It comes up two ways:
Paper 1 — multiple choice
- Classify an entry as a strength, weakness, opportunity or threat.
- Identify which lens an entry came from.
Paper 2 — analysing a product
- Analyse a named product using a SWOT.
- Explain the decision a completed SWOT leads to.
The trap: Writing a weakness and its mirror image as an opportunity. Opportunities and threats are EXTERNAL — a market gap, a regulation, a rival, a supplier.
Analyse an electric kettle using a SWOT, and state the two decisions it leads to.
Model answer plan
See the mark-by-mark plan — for / against / judgement, with marking guidance — in study mode.