In one line: Some conditions appear only when a built-in vulnerability meets enough life stress — neither alone is usually enough.
The diathesis-stress model is a biological-approach explanation. A diathesis is a predisposition — often genetic — and stress is a triggering life event.
This links to the concept of causality: the model says the cause is an interaction, not a single factor. Two things together — nature and nurture — produce the outcome.
Memory hook: Loaded gun + trigger. A vulnerability plus a stressor produces the disorder.
Free preview
This is the free notes preview
You're reading the free notes. Aimnova Pro unlocks the full study experience — and you can try it with your first topic free to keep:
- FlashcardsLock in vocabulary and key terms with spaced repetition.
- Practice questionsAnswer exam-style questions and get instant AI marking.
- Mock exams & past-paper vaultSit full mocks and see exactly how examiners award marks.
- Personalised study planA daily plan built around your exam date and weak areas.
Key idea: The diathesis sets the risk level; stress determines whether that risk turns into a disorder.
The model step by step
Diathesis (vulnerability)
A predisposition — genes, brain chemistry, early experience — that raises risk but doesn't guarantee a disorder.
Stress (trigger)
A life event or ongoing strain — loss, trauma, pressure — that can tip a vulnerable person over.
Interaction
The disorder appears when stress exceeds what the person's vulnerability can withstand.
Vulnerability · Stress · Interaction
Take two students with different vulnerabilities to anxiety. Facing the same exam stress, the more vulnerable student develops an anxiety disorder while the other does not. Same trigger, different diathesis — so the outcome differs. The cause is the interaction.
Go further — higher-level insight: A high vulnerability needs less stress to trigger. Someone with strong genetic risk may develop a condition after only mild stress, while someone with low risk may cope with severe stress. This sliding scale is why the same event affects people so differently — a key evaluation point.
Get feedback like a real examiner
Submit your answers and get instant feedback — what you did well, what's missing, and exactly what to write to score full marks.
Key idea: The model is realistic and integrative, but the two parts are hard to measure precisely.
Strengths and limitations
| Strengths and limitations | Strengths | Limitations |
|---|---|---|
| Balance | Combines nature AND nurture — not one-sided | Hard to measure a 'vulnerability' directly |
| Explains | Why the same event affects people differently | Vague on how much stress is 'enough' |
| Use | Guides prevention: reduce stress for at-risk people | Doesn't fully explain protective factors (resilience) |
So the diathesis-stress model is a realistic, integrative explanation that avoids blaming a single cause, but a good evaluation notes vulnerability is hard to measure, the threshold for 'enough' stress is unclear, and it can underplay protective factors like support and resilience.
Watch out: Diathesis is a risk, not a destiny. Having a vulnerability does not mean a disorder is inevitable — without enough stress, it may never appear. Don't present it as fate.