The big idea: Between 750 and 1400 the medieval world got busier and richer. Towns grew, crafts got organised, machines and better farming raised output, and money and credit made trade flow.
For centuries after the fall of Rome, most people in Europe lived on the land and towns shrank. From about the 11th century that changed and towns began to grow again.
More food, safer roads and busier trade routes meant people could gather in one place to make and sell goods rather than farm.
A town was different from a village. Its people bought and sold for a living, and their wealth came from work and trade, not from owning fields.
This new class of townsfolk did not fit neatly into the old world of lords and peasants, and they wanted rights of their own.
Why towns started to grow: Better farming produced a food surplus, so not everyone had to grow their own food.
That freed people to specialise as bakers, weavers, smiths and traders — and cities near rivers, coasts and crossroads swelled as trade revived.
Most towns began on land owned by a lord, a bishop or a king. To grow rich, townsfolk needed freedom from a lord who could tax and command them at will.
So they bargained. In return for money or loyalty, a lord would grant the town a charter.
- Chartered rights — a charter set out what the town was legally allowed to do, in writing, so a lord could not simply take it back.
- Freedom of the townsman — a common saying was that 'town air makes you free': a runaway serf who lived in a chartered town for a year and a day often became a free person.
- The right to hold markets and fairs — permission to trade openly on set days, which drew buyers and sellers from far around.
- Urban self-government — the right to run their own affairs through an elected council, rather than a lord's officials.
Urban self-government was the prize townsfolk wanted most. It meant they could set their own local rules, collect their own taxes and judge their own disputes.
Some Italian cities went furthest of all and became independent communes — Venice, Florence and Genoa acted almost like small states.
Spot it: three things a charter gave: Rights in writing · the right to hold markets · and self-rule through a town council. If an exam question asks about urban growth, these three ideas are your core.
Free preview
This is the free notes preview
You're reading the free notes. Aimnova Pro unlocks the full study experience — and you can try it free for 7 days:
- FlashcardsLock in vocabulary and key terms with spaced repetition.
- Practice questionsAnswer exam-style questions and get instant AI marking.
- Mock exams & past-paper vaultSit full mocks and see exactly how examiners award marks.
- Personalised study planA daily plan built around your exam date and weak areas.
Once townsfolk made and sold goods for a living, they needed rules to keep trade fair and steady. Those rules came from guilds.
A guild was like a mix of a modern trade union, a business club and a training college all in one.
There were two main kinds. Craft guilds brought together everyone in one trade, such as the bakers, the weavers or the goldsmiths.
Merchant guilds brought together the traders who bought and sold goods, and they were often the richest and most powerful group in a town.
- Controlled production — guilds decided who could make goods, so outsiders could not simply set up and undercut members.
- Set prices — they fixed fair prices, aiming to stop both cheating customers and ruinous price wars between members.
- Guarded quality — inspectors checked goods, and shoddy or dishonest work could be seized or fined.
- Ran apprenticeship — they controlled training, so only properly trained workers could join the trade.
Training followed a clear ladder. A boy started as an apprentice, living with a master for years while he learned the skills.
He then became a journeyman, working for wages. If he could produce a fine 'masterpiece' to prove his skill, he might finally become a master and open his own workshop.
Apprentice
A boy, often aged around 12, joined a master for perhaps seven years. He lived in the master's house, learned the craft, and was fed and housed but rarely paid.
Journeyman
Now trained, he worked for a daily wage. The name comes from the French 'journee', meaning a day. He saved money and perfected his skill.
Master
If he made an approved 'masterpiece' and could afford a workshop, he joined the guild as a full master, able to hire others and train his own apprentices.
Apprentice learns, journeyman earns, master runs the workshop.
None of this town life would have been possible without more food, and that came from a farming revolution in the countryside.
Between about 900 and 1300 a set of new tools and methods let medieval farmers grow far more than before.
The heavy plough
The old scratch plough barely cut northern Europe's thick, wet clay soils. The heavy plough had a blade and mouldboard that sliced deep and turned the soil over, opening up rich land that had been hard to farm.
The horse collar
An old harness pressed on a horse's windpipe and half-choked it. The padded horse collar rested on the shoulders, so a horse could pull hard. Horses were faster than oxen, so more land could be worked each day.
Watermills and windmills
Water and wind turned wheels that ground grain into flour without human muscle. Windmills, spreading from the 12th century, worked even where rivers did not — free power on a huge new scale.
The three-field system
Instead of leaving half the land resting, farmers split it in three: one field for a winter crop, one for a spring crop, and one resting. Two-thirds was now farmed each year, not one-half.
Why this mattered: More food meant a bigger population, and more people freed from farming to work in towns.
The heavy plough, horse collar, mills and three-field system did not just feed people — they powered the whole rise of towns, guilds and trade.
Learn what examiners really want
See exactly what to write to score full marks. Our AI shows you model answers and the key phrases examiners look for.
A busy trading world needs a way to pay. Across the medieval world people used coinage, but coins alone could not solve every problem.
Carrying heavy bags of silver across bandit-ridden roads was slow and dangerous, so merchants invented cleverer ways to move value.
- Coinage — silver pennies and gold coins were the everyday money, but every kingdom minted its own, so exchange was messy.
- Bills of exchange — a written promise that let a merchant pay in one city and collect the money in another, avoiding a long journey with cash.
- Letters of credit — a document from a trusted banker promising that its holder was good for a sum of money, a bit like a modern cheque or bank guarantee.
- Moneylending — lending cash and charging back more than was borrowed, which financed trade but was hugely controversial.
These tools grew into early banking. Great families, above all in Italian cities like Florence, kept branches in many cities and moved money between them on paper.
A merchant could deposit coins in Florence and draw the value in London, all without a single coin travelling — the beginnings of modern finance.
The problem with lending: usury: The Christian Church condemned usury as a sin.
The Bible seemed to forbid making money from money, so a Christian who lent cash and charged interest risked their soul. This limited who could openly run banks.
The Church was not just a moral judge; it was a huge economic power in its own right.
It owned vast lands, collected the tithe, and ran an economy of its own through its monasteries.
- Ban on usury — charging interest was a sin, so Christians officially could not run open banks, and Jewish communities were often pushed into moneylending instead.
- Tithes — everyone owed one-tenth of their crops or income to the Church, making it enormously wealthy.
- Church landholding — the Church may have held around a quarter or more of the land in some regions, and its rents were a major income.
- Monastic economies — monasteries farmed, brewed, milled and traded on a big scale, becoming centres of production.
The Islamic world had built a rich commercial economy earlier and in some ways more freely than Christian Europe. Muslim merchants used sophisticated credit tools centuries before they were common in the West.
One of the most famous was the sakk, from which our word 'cheque' comes.
Christian Europe
- The Church banned usury, so lending at interest was officially sinful.
- Banking grew slowly and often through loopholes or non-Christian lenders.
- Bills of exchange and Italian banking families spread mainly from the 12th–13th centuries.
- The Church itself was a giant landowner living off tithes and rents.
The Islamic world
- A sophisticated credit economy flourished across a vast trading zone.
- The sakk (cheque) let merchants pay without carrying coins.
- Business partnerships shared risk and profit between investors and traders.
- Trade linked the Mediterranean, Africa and Asia into one busy market.
A great comparison point: Paper 2 rewards comparing regions. The contrast between a Christian economy limited by the usury ban and a freer Islamic credit economy is a strong, ready-made comparison you can use in an essay.
How rulers taxed their people
The Church was not the only power squeezing money from a busy medieval economy — kings and emperors across the world built their own tax systems, and how they did it says a lot about how strong (or shaky) their rule really was.
- Geld / Danegeld — an English land tax first raised to buy off Viking raiders, later kept by Norman kings as a regular land tax on every landholder; it showed a government organised enough to tax the whole kingdom, not just its own estates.
- Domesday assessment (1086) — William the Conqueror's great survey of England, recording who held every plot of land and what it was worth, so his officials knew exactly how much geld each area owed; a tax record so thorough that people compared it to the Bible's Book of Doom, hence 'Domesday'.
- Yuan-dynasty taxation (China, 1271–1368) — the Mongol Yuan rulers taxed conquered Chinese peasants heavily in grain and cash to fund their court and armies, while often taxing favoured foreign merchants more lightly, a system that built revenue but bred deep resentment among ordinary Chinese subjects.
- Kharaj — a land tax paid mainly by non-Muslim landowners across the Abbasid Caliphate, calculated on the value or yield of the land itself, forming one of the biggest sources of state revenue in the Islamic world.
- Jizya — a per-head tax paid by non-Muslim subjects (dhimmi, or protected religious minorities) in the Abbasid Caliphate, in exchange for protection and exemption from military service.
- Labour service (corvée) — instead of coins, many peasants across Europe and Asia paid their lord or the state in work: days spent ploughing the lord's fields, building roads, or repairing fortifications.
- Zakat — an obligatory religious giving of a portion of a Muslim's wealth, one of the Five Pillars of Islam, distinct from kharaj and jizya because it was a religious duty owed by Muslims themselves rather than a state tax on conquered or minority subjects.
| Tax | Who paid it | Paid in |
|---|---|---|
| Geld / Danegeld | Landholders in Norman England | Coin, assessed via Domesday survey |
| Yuan grain and cash levies | Chinese peasant subjects | Grain and coin |
| Kharaj | Non-Muslim landowners (Abbasid Caliphate) | Coin, based on land value/yield |
| Jizya | Non-Muslim adult subjects (dhimmi) | Coin, per head |
| Labour service | Peasants under a lord or the state | Days of work, not money |
| Zakat | Muslim subjects | A share of personal wealth |
The trade-off: revenue versus rebellion: Every ruler faced the same dilemma. Push taxation too hard, and you fund a stronger army and court — but you also risk pushing subjects into revolt. Tax too lightly, and the treasury runs dry, leaving the ruler unable to pay soldiers or officials at all.
William the Conqueror's Domesday survey let Norman kings tax efficiently, but the sheer intrusiveness of the survey (recording almost every ox and pig) bred resentment among the English. Yuan tax burdens on Chinese peasants, alongside favouritism shown to foreign merchants, fed the grievances that fuelled rebellions which eventually toppled the dynasty. Abbasid caliphs who raised kharaj and jizya too aggressively risked unrest among both peasant farmers and religious minorities, weakening the very provinces that funded the empire.
Naming types of taxation: The syllabus asks for the social and economic impact of taxation, not just a list of names. When you write about geld, kharaj, jizya or labour service, always pair the tax with its effect: did it strengthen the state, burden the poor, target a religious minority, or spark rebellion? That link is what earns marks.