The big idea: Inequality is not just about class and money — it runs along lines of identity.
Identity and disadvantage
- Gender, race, ethnicity, religion, sexuality and disability all shape who faces discrimination and unequal life-chances.
- People hold several identities at once, so disadvantages can overlap.
- This key idea is called intersectionality.
- Discrimination — being treated worse because of an identity (gender, race, religion, sexuality, disability).
- Unequal life-chances — identity shaping access to education, work, health, safety and political voice.
- Intersectionality — overlapping identities creating compounded disadvantage (e.g. a poor woman from a minority group).
- Identity politics — groups mobilising around a shared identity to claim equality and recognition.
Equality is about recognition, not just resources: Fighting inequality is not only about redistributing money — it is also about recognition: respecting and including people whatever their identity, and ending the discrimination that denies them equal standing. A poor person and a discriminated-against person may both be unequal, but they need different things — one needs resources, the other respect and rights. Real equality requires both.
Free preview
This is the free notes preview
You're reading the free notes. Aimnova Pro unlocks the full study experience — and you can try it with your first topic free to keep:
- FlashcardsLock in vocabulary and key terms with spaced repetition.
- Practice questionsAnswer exam-style questions and get instant AI marking.
- Mock exams & past-paper vaultSit full mocks and see exactly how examiners award marks.
- Personalised study planA daily plan built around your exam date and weak areas.
Identity-based inequality is often invisible to those not affected, and compounded by intersectionality. Groups have long mobilised around identity — for gender equality, racial justice, indigenous and LGBTQ+ rights — to demand recognition and rights.
Why identity-based inequality is distinct
Unlike class inequality, identity-based inequality can persist even for the wealthy — a rich person can still face discrimination, exclusion or violence because of their gender, race, religion or sexuality. It is rooted in prejudice and denial of recognition, so it cannot be solved by money alone; it requires ending discrimination and granting equal standing and rights.
What intersectionality adds
People hold many identities at once, and disadvantages can overlap and compound — a poor, disabled woman from an ethnic minority faces intersecting discriminations that are more than the sum of their parts. Intersectionality warns that treating each identity separately misses those at the overlaps, who are often the most marginalised and least heard.
Case study — mobilising around identity for equality: Across the world, groups have mobilised around a shared identity to demand equality.
Examples of these movements
- Movements for gender equality
- Movements for racial justice
- Movements for indigenous rights
- Movements for LGBTQ+ rights
What they fight for
- Not only resources but recognition.
- Recognition means an end to discrimination, and equal legal and social standing.
What it has achieved
- Such identity politics has won real rights.
- It has reshaped what equality means.
The criticism
- Critics argue it can also divide society into competing groups.
The HL lesson
- Equality has a crucial identity dimension: discrimination and the denial of recognition, not just poverty.
- Addressing it requires ending discrimination.
- It also requires including the voices of those at the intersections.
The key point: Inequality runs along lines of identity — gender, race, ethnicity, religion, sexuality, disability — through discrimination and unequal life-chances, and intersectionality shows how overlapping identities compound disadvantage. Equality therefore requires recognition (respect, rights, an end to discrimination), not just redistribution of resources.
Know your predicted grade
Take timed mock exams and get detailed feedback on every answer. See exactly where you're losing marks.
Is inequality mainly about class/resources or identity/recognition? Does identity politics advance equality or divide society? Weigh it — and recommend.
The case for identity politics
Organising around a shared identity has won real rights and recognition for groups that class-based politics ignored — voting rights, anti-discrimination law, equal marriage, indigenous protections. It gives voice to the specifically marginalised and names injustices that 'we're all equal' rhetoric hides, so it has genuinely advanced equality.
The critique of identity politics
Critics argue that focusing on group identities can fragment society into competing camps, obscure the shared class interests of the poor across identities, breed resentment, and reduce individuals to their group. They argue for a universal focus on rights and economic fairness that unites rather than divides — though supporters reply this ignores the reality of identity-based discrimination.
Two perspectives — weigh them: One view: inequality is fundamentally about class and resources, and identity politics divides. Another view: identity-based discrimination is a distinct, real injustice needing recognition.
The strong HL judgement
- Inequality has both a resource dimension (redistribution) and an identity dimension (recognition).
- The two are intertwined and often compound each other.
- So real equality requires addressing both, including those at the intersections, rather than choosing one.
How identity and equality comes up in Paper 3: Paper 3 stimulus might show discrimination, a rights movement or intersecting disadvantage. Analyse the recognition vs redistribution and intersectionality ideas, then recommend a response — usually ending discrimination (recognition) AND reducing poverty (redistribution), including the marginalised.
How Paper 3 rewards you (HL)
Understand
Show you understand the challenge and the stimulus material accurately.
base
Analyse
Break the challenge down — causes, actors, perspectives — using the material.
analyse
Recommend
Propose and justify a course of action — the Paper-3-specific skill.
recommend
Synthesise
Pull the material together into a judged, evaluated response.
top
Recommend how a society could tackle inequality that runs along lines of identity.
Model answer plan
See the mark-by-mark plan — for / against / judgement, with marking guidance — in study mode.
Common mistakes (Paper 3): 1. Reducing inequality to class/money. Identity discrimination is distinct.
2. Ignoring recognition. Equality needs respect and rights, not just resources.
3. Forgetting intersectionality. Overlapping identities compound.
4. Only describing. Analyse + recommend.
5. Choosing identity OR class. Real equality needs both.