Population and environmental impact
Big idea: Population growth increases pressure on resources and ecosystems. However, impact depends not just on population size but also on consumption levels and technology.
The IPAT equation
Environmental impact can be expressed as:
- I = P × A × T
- I = Environmental Impact
- P = Population size
- A = Affluence (consumption per person)
- T = Technology (impact per unit of consumption)
A small, wealthy population can have MORE impact than a large, poor one. The average American has ~16x the carbon footprint of the average Indian.
Population pressures on the environment
- Food demand: Land conversion, intensification, overfishing
- Water demand: Aquifer depletion, river diversion, water stress
- Energy demand: Fossil fuel use, climate change
- Resource extraction: Mining, deforestation, biodiversity loss
- Waste production: Pollution, landfills, ocean plastics
- Habitat loss: Urban expansion, agricultural expansion
Exam tip: When discussing population and environment, always consider BOTH population size AND consumption patterns. Its not just about numbers.
Population strategies and ethics
Big idea: Strategies to address population growth range from voluntary family planning to coercive policies. These raise significant ethical questions about human rights, cultural values, and who makes decisions.
Population management approaches
- Family planning programmes: Provide contraception, information, and services — voluntary approach
- Education investment: Especially female education — most effective long-term strategy
- Economic development: Raises living standards, naturally reduces fertility
- Incentives: Tax benefits for smaller families, childcare support
- Disincentives: Penalties for large families (e.g., Chinas former one-child policy)
- Pro-natalist policies: Encourage births in countries with ageing populations (e.g., Japan, Hungary)
Ethical considerations
Arguments for intervention
- Environmental sustainability requires stable population
- Resource scarcity affects everyone
- Preventing future suffering
- Collective responsibility
Arguments against intervention
- Reproductive rights are human rights
- Cultural and religious values
- Coercion is unethical
- Consumption matters more than population
- Colonial/racist history of population control
Chinas one-child policy (1979-2015) showed that coercive approaches can reduce fertility but cause unintended consequences: gender imbalance, ageing population, and human rights abuses.
Exam tip: Population strategy essays require a balanced argument. Discuss effectiveness AND ethical implications before reaching a justified conclusion.