The big idea: Every state has a government, but they come in wildly different shapes — one ruler, a few, the many, or a holy book.
Who rules — and by what right?: The deeper question isn't just 'who rules?' but 'what gives them the RIGHT to?' — their legitimacy. A government can have all the power and still not be legitimate.
Forms of government
Monarchy
Rule by one, usually by birth — a king or queen.
Oligarchy
Rule by a few — the rich, a party, or a small elite.
Democracy
Rule by the many — the people choose, usually by voting.
Authoritarian / totalitarian
Rule by force with little freedom; totalitarian control reaches into every part of life.
Theocracy
Rule in the name of a religion — a god or holy law as the final authority.
One · Few · Many · Total · Sacred
Free preview
This is the free notes preview
You're reading the free notes. Aimnova Pro unlocks the full study experience — and you can try it with your first topic free to keep:
- FlashcardsLock in vocabulary and key terms with spaced repetition.
- Practice questionsAnswer exam-style questions and get instant AI marking.
- Mock exams & past-paper vaultSit full mocks and see exactly how examiners award marks.
- Personalised study planA daily plan built around your exam date and weak areas.
A government can seize control by force, but that doesn't make its rule rightful. Legitimacy is the difference.
Obligations run BOTH ways: Legitimacy isn't a one-way street. You owe the state some things, and the state owes YOU things too.
You owe the state
- Obey fair laws
- Pay tax
- Don't take justice into your own hands
The state owes YOU
- Protect you
- Treat you fairly
- Serve the common good, not just its rulers
When a side breaks the deal: When one side keeps its side of the deal, the other's duty is strong. When the state badly breaks its side, your duty to obey gets weaker.
Checkpoint — legitimacy: In one line: legitimacy is the accepted RIGHT to rule, not just the power to — and it comes with duties the state owes you in return. Hold that — next, what happens when a government loses it entirely?
Practice with exam-style questions
Answer exam-style questions and get AI feedback that shows you exactly what examiners want to see in a full-marks response.
Two ideas test the limits: one asks when a bad state may be overthrown, the other asks whether we need a state at all.
Revolution
- A state that badly breaks its side of the deal can lose the right to rule
- For: Locke — if it attacks the rights it should protect, the people may replace it
- Against: revolutions risk chaos and a new tyranny; the bar must be high
Anarchism
- Maybe NO state is ever fully legitimate — all rule is coercion
- For: why should anyone have the right to force others at all?
- Against: with no state we may fall back into Hobbes's war of all against all
Go further — higher-level insight: Anarchism is more than 'chaos' — at its best it's a serious challenge: it asks the state to JUSTIFY its right to force people, rather than assuming it.
Go further — the toughest test: Even if you reject anarchism, using it as the toughest test of legitimacy ('can the state answer the anarchist?') is a top-band move — it forces you to say exactly what makes rule rightful.
Checkpoint — the limits: In one line: revolution asks when bad rule may be overthrown; anarchism asks whether any rule is legitimate at all. Both press on what legitimacy really requires.