The big idea: Descartes built a chain: doubt → the cogito → dualism → God → the world. A chain is only as strong as its weakest link.
The real Paper-2 question: It isn't 'what did Descartes say?' — it's how much of it actually survives when you press on it.
Two objections do the most damage: the Cartesian circle aimed at the God-proofs, and the interaction problem aimed at dualism.
Hold onto this: Evaluating isn't just 'I disagree.' It's testing each link: is the reasoning valid, are the premises true, does the objection really bite?
Free preview
This is the free notes preview
You're reading the free notes. Aimnova Pro unlocks the full study experience — and you can try it with your first topic free to keep:
- FlashcardsLock in vocabulary and key terms with spaced repetition.
- Practice questionsAnswer exam-style questions and get instant AI marking.
- Mock exams & past-paper vaultSit full mocks and see exactly how examiners award marks.
- Personalised study planA daily plan built around your exam date and weak areas.
Start Studying Free Full access to Aimnova Pro · cancel anytime
The most famous objection targets the God-proofs at the heart of the rebuild.
Checkpoint — the circle: In one line: if God guarantees clear ideas but you needed clear ideas to prove God, the rebuild may rest on nothing. Hold that — it threatens everything after the cogito.
See how examiners mark answers
Answer exam-style questions with model answers. Learn exactly what earns marks and what doesn't.
Try Exam Vault FreeYour first topic is free to keep • No credit card required
The second objection hits dualism, and then we can ask what's left standing.
How do mind and body touch?: If the mind is unextended (no location, no physical force) and the body is purely physical, how does one move the other?
The problem
- When you decide to raise your arm, a non-physical thought somehow pushes a physical muscle
- But physical things are moved by physical causes
- Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia put this to Descartes directly, and he never gave a satisfying answer
- The very gap dualism opens between mind and body makes their obvious teamwork hard to explain
What looks strong
- The cogito is genuinely hard to doubt
- The method of doubt is a brilliant tool
- The wax argument really does show the mind's role
What looks shaky
- The God-proofs face the circle
- Dualism faces the interaction problem
- The rebuild of the world leans on God, so it wobbles too
Go further — higher-level insight: A top answer separates the foundations from the building. The cogito and the method of doubt are Descartes' lasting gifts and largely survive. It's the upper storeys — the God-proofs and the world they support — that critics knock down. Saying which parts fall and which stand is exactly the evaluation part (b) rewards.