🌱 The Infant Industry Argument
Infant industry argument.
- New industries face high initial costs and can't compete with established firms that already have economies of scale.
- Temporary protection (tariffs/subsidies) gives them time to grow, learn, and reduce costs.
- Once competitive, the protection should be removed.
- Widely used by East Asian economies (South Korea, Taiwan, Japan) in their industrialisation.
- ❌ Difficult to identify which industries will become competitive — governments may pick 'losers'.
- ❌ Protection often becomes permanent — industries lobby to keep tariffs even after maturing.
- ❌ Removes the incentive to become efficient if protection is guaranteed.
The infant industry argument is the most widely accepted justification for protection by economists. But always evaluate: protection must be temporary and removed once the industry matures.
🛡️ Other Key Arguments for Protection
National security
A country should protect industries vital to defence and security (e.g. steel, energy, food production) so it isn't dependent on potentially hostile nations. This argument is hard to abuse if defined narrowly but is often stretched to cover many industries.
Protecting domestic jobs
When cheap imports threaten domestic industries, governments protect jobs to prevent structural unemployment. However, this argument is weak long-term: resources should shift to competitive industries.
Government revenue
For developing countries with limited tax-collection capacity, tariffs can be an important source of government revenue. This argument weakens as countries develop better tax systems.
Anti-dumping
Dumping.
Anti-dumping tariffs are permitted under WTO rules. However, proving dumping is difficult, and the accusation is sometimes used as an excuse for ordinary protectionism.
See how examiners mark answers
Access past paper questions with model answers. Learn exactly what earns marks and what doesn't.
🌿 Environmental and Strategic Arguments
Environmental protection
- Restricting imports of goods produced using environmentally damaging methods (e.g. products linked to deforestation).
- Preventing a 'race to the bottom' where countries lower environmental standards to gain trade competitiveness.
- However, this can be used as disguised protectionism — hard to verify claims.
Strategic trade policy
Governments may protect industries with large positive externalities, spillover effects, or strategic importance for future growth (e.g. semiconductors, AI, green energy).
Balance of payments correction
A country with a large current account deficit may impose tariffs to reduce imports and improve the balance of payments. However, this may invite retaliation and is usually only a short-term fix.