Egypt, Iran and Lebanon: revolutions, rulers and civil war

Answer

The belief that all Arab countries should unite politically as one people, rather than remain divided under separate, often Western-influenced, governments.

Answer

A 1958–1961 political union of Egypt and Syria under Nasser's presidency, formed to advance Pan-Arabism; it collapsed when Syria left after a military coup, resenting Egyptian domination.

Answer

Sadat's 'open door' economic policy from the 1970s that reversed Nasser's socialism, encouraging foreign investment and private business — it enriched a few but left many Egyptians poorer as subsidies were cut.

Answer

Mubarak (from 1981) kept the peace treaty with Israel but rebuilt Arab ties, and ruled cautiously through emergency law and one-party dominance rather than making dramatic reversals like Sadat did.

Answer

Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi's reform programme from 1963, including land redistribution, votes for women, and literacy campaigns — intended as reform 'without bloodshed'.

Answer

SAVAK was the Shah's secret police, used to crush political and religious dissent — its repression was a major cause of the resentment that fed into the 1979 Revolution.

Answer

A religious leader who became the figurehead of opposition to the Shah from exile; he returned to Iran in February 1979 after the Shah fled, and led the creation of an Islamic Republic.

Answer

Massive casualties on both sides, a devastated economy, no territorial change (stalemate), and the new Iranian regime used the war to unify the country and suppress remaining opposition.

Answer

A power-sharing system from the 1943 National Pact reserving the presidency for a Maronite Christian, the premiership for a Sunni Muslim, and the speakership for a Shia Muslim.

Answer

After being expelled from Jordan in Black September (1970–71), the PLO relocated to Lebanon and launched attacks on Israel from there, drawing Israeli invasions (1978, 1982) and deepening Lebanese divisions.

Answer

An agreement that rebalanced Lebanon's Confessional power-sharing formula to better reflect the growing Muslim population share, helping bring the civil war to an end in 1990.

Answer

Both used centralised, authoritarian control to drive rapid change, but Nasser pushed state socialism and Pan-Arabism while the Shah pushed westernizing capitalism — opposite ideological directions.