1917 Revolutions and Lenin's Soviet Union

Answer

1) Military catastrophe (mass casualties, defeats at Tannenberg) destroyed army morale. 2) Nicholas II took personal command in 1915, linking his name directly to every defeat. 3) Economic breakdown — inflation, food shortages and railway collapse in Petrograd triggered the February 1917 strikes.

Answer

Dual power (dvoevlastie) describes the coexistence of two competing authorities after February 1917: the Provisional Government (legal authority, no real popular control) and the Petrograd Soviet (mass support, controlled soldiers via Order Number 1). Neither could act decisively without the other — this paralysis benefited the Bolsheviks.

Answer

Lenin's April Theses demanded: no support for the Provisional Government; immediate peace; land to the peasants; all power to the Soviets. They gave the Bolsheviks a radical, distinctive programme ('Peace, Land, Bread') that no other party offered, sharply differentiating them from Mensheviks and SRs who cooperated with the Provisional Government.

Answer

As chairman of the Petrograd Soviet, Trotsky organised the Military Revolutionary Committee whose Red Guards seized key Petrograd buildings (bridges, railway stations, telephone exchange, Winter Palace) on 24–25 October 1917. He timed the coup to coincide with the Second Congress of Soviets, giving it Soviet legitimacy. Lenin provided ideology; Trotsky provided the actual seizure.

Answer

The Bolsheviks won only 24% of seats in free elections to the Constituent Assembly (Socialist Revolutionaries won the majority). When the Assembly met on 5 January 1918, Lenin dissolved it after one day — it contradicted Bolshevik power and showed they were unwilling to accept democratic outcomes that went against them.

Answer

Reds: unified command under Trotsky; controlled industrial heartland (Moscow/Petrograd); conscript army of 5 million; clear propaganda message; peasant support (fear of landlords returning). Whites: foreign backing (Britain, France, USA) but insufficient; geographically dispersed; divided aims (tsarists vs liberals vs SRs); atrocities alienated potential supporters.

Answer

War Communism was Lenin's emergency economic policy during the Civil War: nationalized all industry, banned private trade, and sent armed detachments (prodotryad) to forcibly requisition peasant grain to feed the Red Army. Results: fed the army but caused catastrophic famine (5 million deaths, 1921–22), peasant revolts and the Kronstadt uprising — forcing Lenin to abandon it.

Answer

Kronstadt sailors — once 'the pride and glory of the revolution' — revolted demanding free soviets, an end to grain requisitioning and multi-party socialism. Trotsky suppressed it by force. It shocked Lenin because it showed even revolutionary supporters had turned against War Communism, directly prompting him to announce the New Economic Policy.

Answer

The NEP (from March 1921) replaced grain requisitioning with a fixed tax in kind — peasants could sell surplus on the open market. Small businesses and retail were legalised. Heavy industry (railways, banks, large factories) stayed in state hands. A new stable currency was introduced. The NEP successfully restored agricultural output to pre-war levels by 1925.

Answer

The Comintern (1919) was designed to spread world revolution globally — an ideological goal. But practical survival came first: the humiliating Treaty of Brest-Litovsk (1918) traded vast territory for peace; the Soviet-Polish War (1920) ended in defeat; the Rapallo Treaty (1922) with Germany was a pragmatic alliance of two pariah states. By 1924 the USSR accepted diplomatic recognition rather than revolution abroad.

Answer

The Cheka was the Bolshevik secret police, founded December 1917 under Felix Dzerzhinsky. It arrested, tortured and executed 'class enemies', White sympathisers and political opponents. The Red Terror (September 1918) intensified after an assassination attempt on Lenin. The Cheka embodied the principle that political repression ran alongside every economic and military policy throughout Lenin's rule.

Answer

Revolution argument: genuine mass discontent (bread shortages, war exhaustion, anti-Provisional Government sentiment) created revolutionary conditions; Bolsheviks represented real working-class aspirations. Coup argument: a disciplined minority (Military Revolutionary Committee) seized power overnight; the Bolsheviks had only 24% electoral support; the Congress of Soviets was presented with a fait accompli. Strong essays acknowledge both: revolutionary conditions + minority seizure.