aımnova
DashboardMy LearningPaper MasteryStudy Plan

Aimnova site navigation

Stay in the loop

Get the latest study resources and updates

New features, study tips and exam insights — straight to your inbox.

IB Diploma

  • IB Past Papers
  • IB Study Notes
  • IB Question Bank
  • IB Mock Exams
  • IB Revision

IB Subjects

  • IB Math AA
  • IB Math AI
  • IB Economics
  • IB Business Management
  • IB Physics
  • IB Biology
  • View all IB subjects→

IB Past Papers

  • IB Math AA HL Past Papers
  • IB Math AA SL Past Papers
  • IB Math AI HL Past Papers
  • IB Math AI SL Past Papers
  • IB Economics HL Past Papers
  • IB Economics SL Past Papers
  • IB ESS Past Papers
  • View all past papers→

Study Resources

  • Study Notes
  • Question Bank
  • Mock Exams
  • Flashcards
  • Revision Guide
  • Exam Skills
  • Command Terms
  • Grade Calculator
  • Exam Timetable 2026

Aimnova

  • Features
  • Pricing
  • For Teachers
  • For Schools
  • For Parents
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact
aımnova

IB study, practice and feedback built around the real exam.

TermsPrivacyCookies·© 2026 Aimnova. All rights reserved.104ee95

Aimnova is not affiliated with or endorsed by the International Baccalaureate Organization (IB).

NotesGlobal PoliticsTopic 4.1
Unit 4 · Peace and conflict · Topic 4.1

IB Global Politics — Contested meanings: peace, conflict, violence, non-violence

Topic 4.1 of IB Global Politics covers Contested meanings: peace, conflict, violence, non-violence, which is part of Unit 4: Peace and conflict. Students explore key concepts including Peace: positive and negative, Conflict: latent and overt, Violence: direct, structural and cultural, Non-violence. A strong understanding of contested meanings: peace, conflict, violence, non-violence is essential for IB Global Politics exams and builds the foundation for connected topics across the syllabus.

Exam technique guidePractice questions

Key concepts in Contested meanings: peace, conflict, violence, non-violence

Key Idea: This topic is about what the words really mean. Before you can argue about war and peace, you have to see that peace, conflict, violence and non-violence are all contested — people define them differently, and the definition you pick shapes your whole argument. One idea ties it all together: {{Galtung|the peace theorist who split violence into direct/structural/cultural and peace into negative/positive}}'s frame.

🔑 The four key terms

TermNarrow meaningDeeper meaning
Peaceno fighting (negative peace)a just society with no structural violence (positive peace)
Conflictopen fighting (overt)any clash of goals, even hidden (latent)
Violencedirect physical harmalso structural (unjust systems) & cultural (ideas that excuse it)
Non-violencenot fightingactive resistance without force — protest, civil disobedience

🔺 Galtung ties it together

📚 The four micros at a glance

What each micro adds

  1. 4.1.1 Peace — Negative peace = no direct violence (a ceasefire). Positive peace = a just society where the CAUSES of conflict are gone. Real peace is positive peace.
  2. 4.1.2 Conflict — Conflict = a clash of goals; it is NOT always violent. Latent (hidden) vs overt (open). Conflict can even be constructive if handled well.
  3. 4.1.3 Violence — Direct (visible harm), structural (injustice built into society) and cultural (ideas that make violence look normal). Structural violence is a deep root of conflict.
  4. 4.1.4 Non-violence — Active resistance without force — protest, civil disobedience, non-cooperation. Its power is mass support and moral legitimacy; it has won independence, rights and democracy.

⚖️ The debates that come up

  • Negative peace = just no violence
  • Positive peace = justice too
  • Judge: lasting peace is positive peace

  • Wins legitimacy & broad support
  • But some regimes crush it
  • Judge: usually durable, depends on opponent

  • Direct violence is visible
  • Structural violence is hidden but deadly
  • Judge: address structural roots for peace
IB-style questionEvaluate[15 marks]

Evaluate the view that peace means more than simply the absence of violence.

Model answer plan

See the mark-by-mark plan — for / against / judgement, with marking guidance — in study mode.

Claim your free topic →

The 15-mark markband (Paper 2)

Bands 1–6

Describe\text{Describe}Describe

Mostly descriptive; perspectives <strong>not identified</strong>.

avoid

Bands 7–9

Identify\text{Identify}Identify

Clear knowledge, but perspectives <strong>identified, not explored</strong>.

7–9

Bands 10–12

Explore\text{Explore}Explore

Well-supported argument; perspectives <strong>explored</strong>.

10–12

Bands 13–15

Evaluate\text{Evaluate}Evaluate

Balanced, compelling; perspectives <strong>explored AND evaluated</strong>.

13–15

Important: Treating the terms as simple and fixed. Examiners reward students who show the terms are <strong>contested</strong> — e.g. that 'peace' can mean a ceasefire OR a just society, and that <strong>structural violence</strong> is real violence even without anyone throwing a punch. Always define your terms and pick the deeper meaning.
Answer in your head first, then tap to reveal.

Negative peace vs positive peace? Negative peace = the absence of direct violence (a ceasefire). Positive peace = a just society where the causes of conflict, like structural violence, are removed.

What are Galtung's three types of violence? Direct (visible physical harm), structural (injustice built into how society is organised) and cultural (ideas and beliefs that make violence look normal or acceptable).

Is conflict always violent? No — conflict is a clash of goals or interests; it can be latent (hidden) or overt (open), and can be resolved peacefully or even be constructive.

Why is non-violence powerful? It is active resistance whose strength is mass participation and moral legitimacy; violence against peaceful protesters exposes a regime, and it has won independence, rights and democracy.

Why does structural violence matter for peace? Because it is a deep root of conflict — unjust systems harm people without direct force, so lasting (positive) peace requires removing structural violence, not just stopping the fighting.

Exam tips

  • Always DEFINE the contested term and pick the deeper meaning.
  • Use Galtung: direct/structural/cultural violence; negative/positive peace.
  • Structural violence is real violence — name it.
  • Non-violence is active resistance, not passivity.
  • Judge: lasting peace = positive peace; move from negative → positive.

What you'll learn in Topic 4.1

  • 4.1.1 Peace: positive and negative
  • 4.1.2 Conflict: latent and overt
  • 4.1.3 Violence: direct, structural and cultural
  • 4.1.4 Non-violence
Suggested study order: Read the notes for each sub-topic below → test yourself with flashcards → attempt practice questions → review exam technique.

Study resources — 4.1 Contested meanings: peace, conflict, violence, non-violence

4.1.1

Peace: positive and negative

Notes
4.1.2

Conflict: latent and overt

Notes
4.1.3

Violence: direct, structural and cultural

Notes
4.1.4

Non-violence

Notes

Ready to study Contested meanings: peace, conflict, violence, non-violence?

Get expert practice questions with instant AI feedback, and a study planner tailored to your IB Global Politics exam date.

Start studying free

Topic 4.1 Contested meanings: peace, conflict, violence, non-violence forms a core part of Unit 4: Peace and conflict in IB Global Politics. Mastering these concepts will strengthen your understanding of connected topics across the syllabus and prepare you for exam questions that require analysis, evaluation, and real-world application.

Previous topic
3.4 Debates in development and sustainability
Next topic
4.2 Actors and parties in conflict
All Global Politics topics
Exam technique

Ready to practice?

Get AI-graded practice questions, mock exams, flashcards, and a personalised study plan — all aligned to your IB syllabus.

Start Studying Free

No credit card required · No time limit