Technology: case studies & synthesis

Answer

(1) Who controls it and who benefits? (2) Power, rights or security? (3) Who is left out (digital divide)? (4) Who makes the rules (governance gap)? (5) What trade-offs?

Answer

Because technology and power, surveillance and rights, cyber conflict and governance interlock — a case usually involves several at once, and Paper 3 rewards synthesising them.

Answer

Who controls the technology and who makes the rules — the questions of control and governance recur across power, rights, security and governance.

Answer

It gives billions voice, information and tools, lets movements organise and expose abuses, and lets the poor leapfrog — a democratising, levelling force.

Answer

It is owned by a few states and firms who surveil, censor and concentrate power, while the digital divide leaves many out and governance lags behind.

Answer

Technology amplifies whoever controls it — whether it empowers people or those in power depends on the political choices we make about control, access and rules.

Answer

The same technology serves freedom or control depending on who wields it and the rules — its double edge proves control and governance decide the outcome.

Answer

Apply the frame to the stimulus (don't recite memorised facts): analyse control, power/rights/security, the digital divide and the governance gap, then recommend and synthesise.

Answer

Because the challenge spans power, rights, access and governance and crosses borders, so no single actor or tool — state, firm or international body — suffices.

Answer

Connect it to the wider challenge — power, rights, security and governance — and weigh trade-offs, landing a judged position on control and access.

Answer

Realism plus agency: technology amplifies whoever controls it, and whether it empowers people or the powerful depends substantially on our political choices about control, access and rules.