Back to Topic 5.7 — Security
5.7.5Global Politics HL11 flashcards

Security: case studies & synthesis

Practice Flashcards

Flip to reveal answers
Card 1 of 115.7.5
5.7.5
Question

What is the five-question frame for a security stimulus?

Click to reveal answer

Track your progress — Sign up free to save your progress and get smart review reminders based on spaced repetition.

All 11 Flashcards — Security: case studies & synthesis

Sign up free to track progress and get spaced-repetition review schedules.

Card 1concept

Question

What is the five-question frame for a security stimulus?

Answer

(1) Security for whom — state or people? (2) Threat from what — traditional or non-traditional? (3) Is it securitized, rightly? (4) Does the response calm or deepen the dilemma? (5) Who should provide protection?

Card 2concept

Question

Why treat security as 'one connected challenge'?

Answer

Because concepts of security, changing threats, the dilemma and human-security responses interlock — a case usually involves several at once, and Paper 3 rewards synthesising them.

Card 3concept

Question

In the case studies, what did the best response usually involve?

Answer

Combining the right tools for the threat with cooperation among several actors (states, IGOs, NGOs) — not military force alone.

Card 4concept

Question

What is the state-centred view on what security should mean?

Answer

The state is the precondition for all other security — without it no one protects people or deters aggression — and military threats persist, so security should keep the state at its centre.

Card 5concept

Question

What is the human-centred view?

Answer

The state is a means whose purpose is protecting people; most real insecurity is now human and non-traditional, so the individual should be the referent object.

Card 6concept

Question

What is the judged conclusion on state vs people?

Answer

The individual is the ultimate referent object (human ends) while the state is the indispensable means — protect people, largely through capable, cooperating states, kept focused.

Card 7concept

Question

What evidence shows security is now human as much as state-centred?

Answer

Non-traditional threats — poverty, disease, internal violence — harm most people far more than inter-state war, so where insecurity really is has shifted to the person.

Card 8concept

Question

How should you handle a case in Paper 3?

Answer

Apply the frame to the stimulus (don't recite memorised facts): name the referent object and threat, check securitization and the dilemma, decide providers, then recommend and synthesise.

Card 9concept

Question

Why must a security recommendation usually be a mix?

Answer

Because most threats are multi-dimensional and transnational, so no single tool or actor suffices — deterrence, cooperation, protection and development must be combined.

Card 10concept

Question

How do you synthesise a security case?

Answer

Connect it to the wider challenge — the state-vs-human debate, changing threats, the dilemma, human-security responses — and to conflict, poverty and rights, weighing trade-offs.

Card 11concept

Question

What is the top-band judgement Paper 3 rewards on security?

Answer

Human ends, state means: the individual is what security is ultimately for, delivered largely through capable, cooperating states, with the concept kept focused enough to act on.

Track your progress with spaced repetition

Sign up free — Aimnova tells you exactly which cards to review and when, so you remember everything before your IB exam.

Start Free