The story everybody knows is that digital systems removed the gatekeepers from music, film and writing. What actually happened is that the gate moved from a person with a name to a ranking without one.
From label to ranking: who decides who is heard, before and after.
Interactive diagram
Explore the labelled diagram, charts and maps for this topic in full study mode.
Free preview
This is the free notes preview
You're reading the free notes. Aimnova Pro unlocks the full study experience — and you can try it with your first topic free to keep:
- FlashcardsLock in vocabulary and key terms with spaced repetition.
- Practice questionsAnswer exam-style questions and get instant AI marking.
- Mock exams & past-paper vaultSit full mocks and see exactly how examiners award marks.
- Personalised study planA daily plan built around your exam date and weak areas.
| What | Before | Now |
|---|---|---|
| Who can publish | Whoever a company chose | Anybody |
| Who is heard | Whoever a company chose | Whoever a ranking chooses |
| Who can be asked why | A person with a job title | Nobody |
| Where income comes from | Sales of copies | A rate the platform sets |
Reach and income came apart: An artist can reach millions and earn very little, because the payment per play is set by a platform rather than by the audience. Before, the size of the audience and the size of the income moved together.
Never wonder what to study next
Get a personalized daily plan based on your exam date, progress, and weak areas. We'll tell you exactly what to review each day.
Real-world examples you can name
#BookTok and algorithmic taste — from 2020
A community of readers posting short book videos whose recommendations, amplified by TikTok's ranking, put backlist titles onto bestseller lists years after publication and changed how publishers market fiction.
Who it affected: Readers, authors and booksellers — an industry reshaped by a recommender.
YouTube's recommendation system — deep-learning system described 2016; borderline-content changes from January 2019
A ranking system that predicts what a viewer will watch next, which the company has said drives the majority of watch time. After criticism that it led viewers towards ever more extreme material, the company began demoting 'borderline' content rather than removing it.
Who it affected: Roughly two billion monthly viewers, and creators whose income depends on the ranking.
Digitizing heritage collections — Google Arts & Culture from 2011; Notre-Dame laser scans used after the 2019 fire
Museums and monuments are photographed and laser-scanned at high resolution and published online. Detailed scans of Notre-Dame made before the fire informed its reconstruction — digitization as preservation, not just access.
Who it affected: People who will never travel to the collection, and conservators rebuilding what burned.
The concept doing the work: Change. #BookTok and algorithmic taste (global, from 2020) is a genuine change in who decides what sells — readers rather than publishers — and a continuity as well, because the publisher still prints it and still takes most of the money.
How this is tested — arts questions look easy and collapse into opinion unless you name the mechanism that decides who is heard. It comes up two ways:
Paper 1 — structured question
- Part b: explain how a platform affects what is produced
- Part c: evaluate the impact on artists
Paper 2 — source-based question
- Q2: explain a claim about creative work in a source
- Q4: synthesise sources on streaming and income
The trap: “everybody can be famous now”: Everybody can publish. Being heard is decided by a ranking nobody can question, which is a change in who holds power, not its removal.
Explain one way a recommendation system changes the kind of work that gets made.
Model answer plan
See the mark-by-mark plan — for / against / judgement, with marking guidance — in study mode.
Evaluate the impact of streaming platforms on musicians.
Model answer plan
See the mark-by-mark plan — for / against / judgement, with marking guidance — in study mode.